Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How F1 learned to grow without growing

Feature
Formula 1
How F1 learned to grow without growing

Clark, Senna, Antonelli – How the grand chelem age record evolved

Formula 1
Clark, Senna, Antonelli – How the grand chelem age record evolved

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Haug highlights qualifying problem

Mercedes Motorsport boss Norbert Haug has highlighted the potential for controversy caused by the new one-shot qualifying format in F1, despite his driver Kimi Raikkonen topping the split-condition first qualifying session at Nurburgring

Haug believes that Formula 1 should adopt a DTM-style 'Super-Pole' system, which has proven highly popular in the touring car series this year.

"On the one hand, mixed conditions can create unusual grids but if you had two guys fighting for the world championship and it was decided by someone getting a dry track and someone else having to run in the wet, I think there would be a lot of criticism," said Haug.

"We could use a system similar to the DTM, where drivers have three sets of tyres to set their best lap, followed by a top 10 run-off. That would mean that the window (for changeable conditions) is tighter."

In general terms, however, Haug backed the revamped F1 schedule. "It works well," he said, "and having fuel in the car for qualifying works better than expected and creates surprises. You need to look at the race on Sunday before you know where you are."

Haug's opposite number at BMW, Mario Theissen added: "I like one car out at a time because everyone has full attention, but I think that perhaps it would be better if you had a second run, like in skiing or ski-jumping, where the top 50 percent get to go again. Qualifying with race fuels is better than expected. Originally I was critical but it's interesting for us even if a little hard for the spectators.

"On another mater, I think we should try to get back to common testing ground rather than having separate schemes. I think it would be good for the show to have more testing on a race weekend - it would be better for the spectators and for the organisers."

Previous article New 'Schumi Chicane' Raises Ire at Nurburgring
Next article Minardi hopes Bernie brand is ace card

Top Comments