Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

German makes against V8s

The engine bosses of both McLaren Mercedes and BMW Williams have spoken out against the FIA's proposal to change F1 engine capacity in 2008

The formula currently utilises 3.0-litre V10 engines and a raft of proposals released by the sport's governing body recommends a change to 2.4-litre V8s in the interests of reducing costs and curtailing performance levels.

BMW Motorsport director Mario Theissen said, however: "The objectives we fully support but I'd be careful to keep the objectives apart from the solutions. Cost reduction is the most urgent thing and I think we should try to get that done before 2008.

"Given that, we would not propose a different engine format. If we move from 3.0-litre V10s to 2.4-litre V8s, it will mean that for one year we will have to do two engines in parallel. The costs of the V8 would be no more than 5 percent lower and so, in total, it wouldn't be a cost reduction. But, we support extending engine life, even beyond two races. That would take power down and mean a massive cost cut. I think we need to spend a bit more thought on it."

The FIA is likely to counter, however, that the capacity cuts are the most effective way to reduce performance, and point out that this year's doubling of the engine mileage has not, in fact, reduced power.

Theissen's opposite number at McLaren Mercedes, Norbert Haug, said: "My personal view is that a change of engine regulations doesn't help to save money. Two cylinders less to save money on parts, I don't think is the right choice." Haug emphasised, however, that Mercedes-Benz and McLaren will play a full and constructive part in the FIA's forthcoming discussions.

Previous article BAR expects form to continue
Next article Exclusive: BAR Modify Wing After Ferrari Complaint

Top Comments