Gary Anderson: F1 doom-mongers were wrong
AUTOSPORT technical expert GARY ANDERSON explains how the Australian Grand Prix shut up the naysayers, and offers an alternative approach to fuel-flow monitoring
Formula 1 headed to Melbourne fearing a disaster. But as it turned out, the weekend went more or less like any race last year.
Some teams had more problems than others, but we ended up with 15 cars running at the chequered flag (Jules Bianchi's Marussia was still on the track but had lost too much time at the start to be classified).
Share Or Save This Story
Ask Gary: Is there value in crossovers like Hamilton/Rossi?
Gary Anderson: How F1's 'privateers' really fared in 2019
F1's 'big four' teams' real 2019 performance levels revealed
What F1 learned from Ferrari's fuel breach
Ask Gary: Will the 2021 rules mean a Mercedes car concept change?
Where did Red Bull-Honda's pace come from?
Will Wolff's absence affect Mercedes in Brazil?
F1's prescriptive 2021 rules will only cause design convergence
DTM rivals question Lamborghini’s “overperformance” in Spielberg races
Red Bull staff being poached is a “natural development” – Marko
BTCC Brands Hatch: Vauxhall duo claim 1-2 in free practice
Vinales "looked like a cone" after Motegi sprint start woes
How Hulkenberg transformed his F1 career with Haas
Jon Noble: Why even F1’s cleverest minds get lost in explaining rollercoaster season
Can Alpine’s latest regime change shift its course?
What happened the last time Verstappen did community service
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
