Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

MotoGP plans Austin showcase during F1 US GP

MotoGP
MotoGP plans Austin showcase during F1 US GP

The shocking aspect to Antonelli's rapid F1 title-contending transformation

Feature
Formula 1
Hungarian GP
The shocking aspect to Antonelli's rapid F1 title-contending transformation

Kay keeps two-wins advantage with Elan spirit in Autosport National Rankings

National
Kay keeps two-wins advantage with Elan spirit in Autosport National Rankings

"We don't want to put tape on anyone's mouth" – F1 boss reacts to driver criticism of 2026 rules

Formula 1
"We don't want to put tape on anyone's mouth" – F1 boss reacts to driver criticism of 2026 rules

Why the 2026 F1 season won’t end in Las Vegas

Formula 1
Why the 2026 F1 season won’t end in Las Vegas

How a young driver is using his illness to help others

Feature
National
How a young driver is using his illness to help others

The litmus test that has Hyundai confident for WRC season run-in

WRC
Rally Finland
The litmus test that has Hyundai confident for WRC season run-in

How F1 2026 has been a season of two halves for Ferrari so far

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
How F1 2026 has been a season of two halves for Ferrari so far

Full Statement by the Court of Appeal

The FIA International Court of Appeal met in Paris on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, to hear the appeal introduced by the Motor Sports Association Ltd, on behalf of competitor BMW WilliamsF1 Team, car n°4: driver Ralf Schumacher, against Stewards' decision No. 41 taken on August 3, 2003, during the German Grand Prix.

The FIA International Court of Appeal met in Paris on Tuesday, August 19, 2003, to hear the appeal introduced by the Motor Sports Association Ltd, on behalf of competitor BMW WilliamsF1 Team, car n°4: driver Ralf Schumacher, against Stewards' decision No. 41 taken on August 3, 2003, during the German Grand Prix.

Having heard the explanations of the parties and examined the various documents and other evidence, the Court confirmed the Stewards' findings against Ralf Schumacher but considered that the sanction imposed (a loss of 10 places on the starting grid at his next Grand Prix) was inappropriate and substituted a fine of 50,000 $US.

It appeared to the Court, in particular from reading the report by Peter Wright (technical and safety consultant) analysing Accident Data Recorder information, not available to the Stewards, that some responsibility might possibly be imputed to the other two drivers involved in the incident. The Court decided that the case should be referred back to the Panel of the Stewards of the German Grand Prix so that the conduct of Rubens Barrichello and Kimi Raikkonen can be considered in light of the evidence from Mr Wright.

The International Court of Appeal was presided over by Mr Philippe Roberti de Winghe (Belgium), and composed of Mr Pedro Romero (Spain), Mr Vassilis Koussis (Greece) and Mr Harry Duijm (Netherlands).

The full text of the International Court of Appeal's decision is available, on request, from the Secretariat of the FIA International Court of Appeal in Paris.

Previous article Appeal court overturns Ralf's grid penalty
Next article Hungary Preview Quotes: Michelin

Top Comments