FIA clarifies engine regulations

The FIA has cleared up some key grey areas in the engine regulations for this year relating to penalties and the implication of parc ferme regulations

Several Formula One outfits had sought further clarification about the final engine regulations, especially relating to the penalties applied for using a ninth power unit and when teams could change them.

McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh told autosport.com earlier this month: "There is still some (confusion), because the regulations were accelerated out, I think some points have to be clarified.

"One of the points that isn't 100 per cent clear in the regulations is if you use your ninth engine do you get a penalty once, or every time you use the ninth engine? Logically, and it's everyone's belief that you get the penalty once, but it isn't explicitly clear in the regulations at the moment. There are a number of things that need to be clarified."

Following enquiries made by autosport.com, the FIA has now confirmed that the penalty applied for using an extra engine would only be levied at the first event it was used.

So if a driver used a ninth engine for the final two races of the season in Brazil and Abu Dhabi, he would only receive a penalty in Interlagos. Another penalty would only be issued if a driver used a further brand new engine.

FIA race director Charlie Whiting also confirmed the penalty was only applicable at the first event it was used.

"A driver would only get a penalty at the event during which the ninth engine is used," he said.

The FIA has also confirmed that teams will be allowed to make engine changes between qualifying and the race without penalty this year - but only if they can prove that there is a problem with their power unit.

Previously, any change from Saturday morning (outside of the free joker engine) resulted in a grid penalty, with parc ferme rules meaning that engine changes after the start of qualifying meaning being moved to the back of the grid.

However, Whiting has also confirmed that teams will be given a bit more flexibility this season - as long as there are genuine issues with the power units.

"Neither an engine, nor any parts of an engine, are on the list of parts which may be worked on or changed in parc ferme," he said.

"However, Article 34.1 does provide for additional work with the permission of the technical delegate. Permission is usually given if a team can satisfy us that there is something wrong with the part in question, if it is not completely evident anyway.

"Therefore, if a team was able to prove there was a fault with an engine they would probably be allowed to change it without penalty. However, if they broke the seals on the original engine to remedy the fault the engine could not be used again."

Article 34.1 of F1's Sporting Regulations relates to the post-qualifying parc ferme regulations, and details what teams may change on their car.

Although engines are not on the list of parts that may be exchanged, a clause in the regulations does open the door for a power unit replacement.

"Any work not listed above may only be undertaken with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request from the team concerned," said the regulations.

"It must be clear that any replacement part a team wishes to fit is similar in mass, inertia and function to the original. Any parts removed will be retained by the FIA."

shares
comments

Honda silent on bail-out report

Rome GP bid not a threat to Monza

How Tsunoda has eliminated a crucial F1 limitation

How Tsunoda has eliminated a crucial F1 limitation

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Japanese GP
GP Racing

How Tsunoda has eliminated a crucial F1 limitation How Tsunoda has eliminated a crucial F1 limitation

How McLaren has revamped its F1 team to become a contender again

How McLaren has revamped its F1 team to become a contender again

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Japanese GP
GP Racing

How McLaren has revamped its F1 team to become a contender again How McLaren has revamped its F1 team to become a contender again

Why precedent doesn’t favour Massa’s F1 legal challenge

Why precedent doesn’t favour Massa’s F1 legal challenge

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
GP Racing

Why precedent doesn’t favour Massa’s F1 legal challenge Why precedent doesn’t favour Massa’s F1 legal challenge

Why Sainz’s Singapore F1 success was not just about DRS genius

Why Sainz’s Singapore F1 success was not just about DRS genius

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Jonathan Noble

Why Sainz’s Singapore F1 success was not just about DRS genius Why Sainz’s Singapore F1 success was not just about DRS genius

 The signs that suggest an immediate Red Bull resurgence in F1's Japanese GP

The signs that suggest an immediate Red Bull resurgence in F1's Japanese GP

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Japanese GP
Alex Kalinauckas

The signs that suggest an immediate Red Bull resurgence in F1's Japanese GP The signs that suggest an immediate Red Bull resurgence in F1's Japanese GP

The lessons Russell can take from his "two-centimetre" Singapore F1 mistake

The lessons Russell can take from his "two-centimetre" Singapore F1 mistake

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

The lessons Russell can take from his "two-centimetre" Singapore F1 mistake The lessons Russell can take from his "two-centimetre" Singapore F1 mistake

Singapore Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Singapore Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Alex Kalinauckas

Singapore Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023 Singapore Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2023

The Singapore secrets that helped Sainz end Verstappen's F1 winning streak

The Singapore secrets that helped Sainz end Verstappen's F1 winning streak

Plus
Plus
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Jake Boxall-Legge

The Singapore secrets that helped Sainz end Verstappen's F1 winning streak The Singapore secrets that helped Sainz end Verstappen's F1 winning streak

Subscribe