Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How a record 10th WRC title bid was reignited after Ogier vs Neuville epic

Feature
WRC
Rally Greece
How a record 10th WRC title bid was reignited after Ogier vs Neuville epic

How Lindblad has shown that he's found his feet in F1

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
How Lindblad has shown that he's found his feet in F1

Why Verstappen burst out laughing during British GP simulator runs

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Why Verstappen burst out laughing during British GP simulator runs

Marquez held 'informal talks' with Honda before committing to Ducati

MotoGP
Marquez held 'informal talks' with Honda before committing to Ducati

How Russell resorted to "abnormal" driving style to win F1 Austrian GP

Formula 1
Austrian GP
How Russell resorted to "abnormal" driving style to win F1 Austrian GP

Five things we learned from MotoGP’s action-packed Dutch GP

Feature
MotoGP
Dutch GP
Five things we learned from MotoGP’s action-packed Dutch GP

Austrian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Austrian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Mercedes boss questions Ferrari's "limitless" F1 upgrades amid budget cap era

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Mercedes boss questions Ferrari's "limitless" F1 upgrades amid budget cap era

FIA blocks vote on engine freeze

Formula One's engine manufacturers have not given up on heading off the threat of a full engine freeze in the sport, despite a proposal to vote on the matter at Thursday's Sporting Working Group (SWG) meeting being rejected

As autosport.com revealed earlier, a group of carmakers had hoped to approve plans for a part engine homologation in the sport from 2008 at the SWG meeting at Montreal. This comes against the backdrop of the FIA having said at Silverstone that it is pressing ahead with plans for a full engine freeze.

The subject of engines was not on the agenda for the SWG meeting, to discuss 2008 rules, but a proposal was going to be put forward to bring the matter up at the end of the meeting.

FIA technical delegate Charlie Whiting, who chaired the meeting, did not allow the matter to be taken to vote, though.

Whiting argued the plans for part-homologation, known as the Monaco Agreement, contained technical elements that should be discussed by the Technical Working Group (TWG) rather than the SWG, and felt that the matter had been brought up too late to be considered.

This comes as a blow to the manufacturers, who are against the move to a full engine freeze. With the rules needing to be approved before June 30, time is running out on their attempts to get the plans for a full engine freeze altered.

However, autosport.com understands that the car makers are hoping to arrange a formal meeting with the FIA prior to the United States Grand Prix so that a vote can be taken before the deadline.

Whiting's argument that the Monaco Agreement vote could not take place because it had been put forward too late has left several car makers disappointed, however.

One source said: "The FIA has had the basic proposal since Monaco, and so did the teams and manufacturers.

"Plus, at the SWG meeting at Barcelona, the 12 teams were forced to vote on the Maranello proposal even though this was never proposed or discussed in advance."

Previous article Button backs Honda staff reshuffle
Next article Schumacher urges Massa to raise his game

Top Comments