FIA approves contentious extra Pirelli 2020 F1 tyre test

The FIA World Motor Sport Council has formally approved the contentious extra Pirelli 2020 Formula 1 tyre test, which will be run at Barcelona on October 7-8

FIA approves contentious extra Pirelli 2020 F1 tyre test

Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull have all offered to take part in the test, and in conjunction with the FIA Pirelli now must decide which teams will do it, as it had indicated that it might be possible for all three to run.

Pirelli had requested the extra test in order to prove its latest 2020 constructions on a high severity circuit, after it had completed its last planned running for next year's tyres with Mercedes at Paul Ricard earlier this month.

But as the testing schedule is part of the sporting regulations a change was required in order to allow the test to happen.

In theory at this stage - with the annual April 30 rules deadline having long passed - any such change would require the unanimous support of the teams.

Some were opposed on the basis that any team taking part would have an advantage by gaining extra knowledge of next year's tyres, despite it being a blind test with the results subsequently shared between all the squads.

But unusually on this occasion, the FIA accepted that a 70% positive vote would be sufficient, and after it achieved that the change was sent to the WMSC for approval.

Speaking before that approval was confirmed, Pirelli F1 boss Mario Isola made it clear that his company sees the extra running as essential.

"There was a request to run a test in Barcelona at the beginning of October to sign off the product for next year," he said.

"That means that we have now an indication of a certain specification of tyre that was going in the direction that was requested by the sport, when we started talking about a wider working range and a reduction of the overheating.

"When we started to develop the 2020 product we were basing our development on the old target letter.

"We were developing a new construction, a new profile, with different targets in mind, but not with a strong push to reduce the overheating again.

"When we started this the season the current product already reduced the overheating compared to last year, but then talking to the drivers they said we want another step in overheating reduction.

"Then there was all this discussion about the working window of the tyre. We had to modify out development programme to try to achieve these targets.

"At that point it was very, very late.

"If we want to do something more in the direction that I just mentioned we have to consider an additional test on a high severity circuit to sign off the product also on the hard and medium, the C1 and C2 compounds.

"Otherwise we miss this information, obviously. We run tests to confirm what we believe we are designing.

"We need track testing to confirm and validate the solutions that we have in mind.

"But it's not guaranteed - I cannot sign here that what we are going to test in Barcelona is what we expect. We run the test, we evaluate the result, and we will take a decision."

Pirelli had originally booked the Barcelona track on October 7-8 for 18-inch Formula 2 tyre testing.

shares
comments
Grosjean reverts to Melbourne-spec car, insists Haas is not "lost"

Previous article

Grosjean reverts to Melbourne-spec car, insists Haas is not "lost"

Next article

When F1 sponsors go rogue

When F1 sponsors go rogue
Load comments
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots Plus

The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots

Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background Plus

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background

OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus Plus

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus

Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline

Formula 1
Sep 21, 2021
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Plus

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

Formula 1
Sep 20, 2021
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Plus

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Plus

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Plus

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Plus

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021