Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Banking on success: Inside Madrid’s new grand prix circuit

Feature
Formula 1
Spanish GP
Banking on success: Inside Madrid’s new grand prix circuit

Tech3 sticks with KTM for MotoGP's 850cc era after Honda talks

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Tech3 sticks with KTM for MotoGP's 850cc era after Honda talks

MotoGP Catalan GP: Acosta claims pole as Bezzecchi and Martin crash in qualifying

MotoGP
Catalan GP
MotoGP Catalan GP: Acosta claims pole as Bezzecchi and Martin crash in qualifying

After Honda's first annual loss in 70 years, what does it mean for its F1 project?

Formula 1
Canadian GP
After Honda's first annual loss in 70 years, what does it mean for its F1 project?

How Formula 1 driving has changed – and stayed the same

Feature
Formula 1
How Formula 1 driving has changed – and stayed the same

The story behind Verstappen’s unique Nurburgring Mercedes set-up

NLS
The story behind Verstappen’s unique Nurburgring Mercedes set-up

How Williams aims to reach "a sensible position" in F1 2026 after double-score Miami

Feature
Formula 1
How Williams aims to reach "a sensible position" in F1 2026 after double-score Miami

Why Verstappen's preparations have left GT rivals in awe

Endurance
Why Verstappen's preparations have left GT rivals in awe

Ferrari: Sainz Australian GP penalty review had sufficient new evidence

Ferrari still feels enough new evidence was presented to reverse Carlos Sainz’s Australian Grand Prix penalty, but will work with the FIA to further improve the policing of Formula 1.

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari

The FIA has dismissed the Scuderia petitioning Sainz’s five-second penalty that was awarded in Melbourne for the Spaniard hitting Fernando Alonso at the final standing restart.

With the round heavily disrupted and ultimately finishing with a procession behind the safety car, the reprimand dropped Sainz from fourth at the flag down to a point-less 12th.

Ferrari launched its right of review request on the grounds that the decision was made in-race, rather than allowing the driver to present their defence to the stewards.

It cited a Force India case from 2014 as a precedent for being able to offer a driver witness statement and new telemetry data to get such a punishment overturned.

Sainz’s late braking point ahead of the Turn 1 collision was provided to the FIA, in addition to the driver arguing too cool tyre temperatures from a slow formation lap and low sun impairing visibility had contributed to the crash.

But the FIA threw the case out on the grounds this did not meet the required “significant and relevant new information which was unavailable to the parties seeking the review at the time of the decision concerned”, while also arguing all drivers were faced with the same conditions as Sainz.

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-23

Carlos Sainz, Ferrari SF-23

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

Ferrari has issued a statement in response, saying that it was satisfied it had provided enough new information but it was “respectful” of the FIA process and outcome.

The team bulletin read: "We acknowledge the FIA decision not to grant us a right of review in relation to the penalty imposed on Carlos Sainz at the 2023 Australian Grand Prix.

"We are naturally disappointed and felt that we had provided sufficient new elements for the FIA to re-examine the decision especially in the context of the particular conditions and multiple incidents that occurred during the final restart.

"We are however respectful of the process and of the FIA decision."

Read Also:

Ferrari, who reached a private settlement with the governing body in early 2020 after its engine fuel-flow system was investigated, added: "We are now looking froward to entering broader discussions with the FIA, F1, and all the teams, with the aims of further improving the policing of our sport, in order to ensure the highest level of fairness and consistency that our sport deserves."

Previous article Full FIA stewards' verdict on Sainz's Australian GP penalty
Next article How the FIA getting certain F1 rule tweaks right highlights other needed changes

Top Comments

Latest news