F1 testing: Was week one a waste of time? Fans' verdicts

Barcelona this week hosted the first of only two four-day Formula 1 pre-season tests before the opening round in Melbourne on March 25 - but it was far from productive

F1 testing: Was week one a waste of time? Fans' verdicts

The weather ensured even less testing time than usual for the teams. Low track temperatures, heavy rain and some snow reduced the opportunities to do meaningful running and the track was empty for long periods.

A mooted extra test day did not happen because the required unanimous support from the 10 teams was not achieved.

Fans on the Autosport Forums debated what, if anything, could have been done differently:

Raest: How much more expensive would it be to fly to Bahrain or Abu Dhabi compared to Barcelona? It's the only testing session they have prior to Australia, surely they could afford to spend a bit more and maximise returns...

hahostolze: Yes moving the test to a different place would be expensive and logistically difficult, but surely spending all that money on a test that doesn't tell you much about your car is an even bigger waste of money?

Seanspeed: It's not just flying people, it's flying all the equipment and everything, too. I imagine the costs aren't minor.

Noikeee: It was a giant anomaly, it never snows at the track.

CoolBreeze: Pre-season tests should be fully sponsored by the FIA. They should pick a really nice warm country and then sponsor the teams to move all equipment and test there.

Andy35: The FIA needs to bring an entire continent into it by testing in South Africa and then doing the first race there.

AustinF1: Even though getting snow or even rain isn't usually a problem in Barcelona, how about just allowing for at least one bad weather day? When scheduling the test, simply tell the teams they'll be allowed to do four days of testing over a specified five or six-day span.

clarkma5: Quite disappointing teams couldn't come together to move the test day. I know a couple of teams had the track booked but there were enough free days to shuffle things around.

It seems a couple of teams decided to save themselves the trouble of rescheduling instead of helping the whole sport. I'm a little tired of that attitude in F1.

Quickshifter: This whole 100% unanimity requirement for even simple things like shifting a lost test day indicates what is wrong with F1. Teams have way too much say in the running of the sport. I hope it changes from 2021.

pdac: There should be a hard timetable and if something untoward happens to disrupt it, so be it. You can't just allow the ones that have flexibility to throw away agreements.

Join the debate on the Autosport Forums

SCUDmissile: Why can't teams test separately again? Let them test wherever they want but give them a limit of how many 9-5 days of running.

Seanspeed: Parity. So bigger teams can't go testing at ideal locations, getting better information and more running than smaller teams stuck in Europe with more problems.

Burai: Since the rules were changed that tests need to have the same safety and medical facilities as a race, the cost has skyrocketed.

It makes far more sense for Force India to chip in one tenth of the cost and ship cars and personnel out than it does for them to swallow 100% of the cost to use Silverstone.

It also means that the FIA, Pirelli, FOM, broadcasters, etc. don't need staff in five different places at once.

ArrowsLivery: I don't think testing is that big of a deal anymore. These teams all have supercomputers which do all the heavy lifting with regards to set-ups and simulations. The tests are just to make sure there isn't any mistakes in fitting all the pieces of the car together and that all the correlations are in order.

amedeofelix: They are, as Gary Anderson pointed out, all imbeciles for not testing the wet tyres!

Knowlesy: The less knowledge they have of their cars the better. More snow please!

shares
comments
F1 testing: What we learned the final day - Autosport Podcast

Previous article

F1 testing: What we learned the final day - Autosport Podcast

Next article

10 things we learned from the first F1 test

10 things we learned from the first F1 test
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Author Graham Keilloh
The delay that quashed Aston Martin’s last F1 venture Plus

The delay that quashed Aston Martin’s last F1 venture

Aston Martin’s only previous foray into Formula 1 in the late 1950s was a short-lived and unsuccessful affair. But it could have been so different, says NIGEL ROEBUCK

Formula 1
Apr 10, 2021
Verstappen exclusive: Why lack of car-racing titles won't hurt Red Bull's ace Plus

Verstappen exclusive: Why lack of car-racing titles won't hurt Red Bull's ace

Max Verstappen’s star quality in Formula 1 is clear. Now equipped with a Red Bull car that is, right now, the world title favourite and the experience to support his talent, could 2021 be the Dutchman’s year to topple the dominant force of Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes?

Formula 1
Apr 9, 2021
Are we at peak F1 right now? Plus

Are we at peak F1 right now?

For many, many years Formula 1 has strived to do and to be better on all fronts. With close competition, a growing fanbase, a stable political landscape and rules in place to encourage sustainability, 2021 is on course to provide an unexpected peak

Formula 1
Apr 8, 2021
How crucial marginal calls will decide the Red Bull vs Mercedes battle in F1 2021 Plus

How crucial marginal calls will decide the Red Bull vs Mercedes battle in F1 2021

The longer Red Bull can maintain a performance edge over Mercedes, the better the odds will be in the team’s favour against the defending world champions. But as the Bahrain Grand Prix showed, many more factors will be critical in the outcome of the 2021 Formula 1 World Championship

Formula 1
Apr 7, 2021
How Williams’ new structure adheres to a growing F1 trend Plus

How Williams’ new structure adheres to a growing F1 trend

Williams held out against the tide for many years but, as MARK GALLAGHER explains, the age of the owner-manager is long gone

Formula 1
Apr 6, 2021
When a journeyman driver's F1 career lasted just 800m Plus

When a journeyman driver's F1 career lasted just 800m

Nikita Mazepin’s Formula 1 debut at the Bahrain Grand Prix lasted mere corners before he wiped himself out in a shunt, but his financial backing affords him a full season. Back in 1993 though, Marco Apicella was an F1 driver for just 800m before a first corner fracas ended his career. Here’s the story of his very short time at motorsport’s pinnacle

Formula 1
Apr 4, 2021
The nightmare timing that now hinders Mercedes Plus

The nightmare timing that now hinders Mercedes

Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton took victory at the Bahrain Grand Prix despite, for a change, not having the quickest car. But any hopes of developing its W12 to surpass Red Bull's RB16B in terms of outright speed could not have come at a worse time.

Formula 1
Apr 2, 2021
How Raikkonen's rapid rise stalled his team-mate's F1 career climb Plus

How Raikkonen's rapid rise stalled his team-mate's F1 career climb

Kimi Raikkonen’s emergence as a Formula 1 star in his rookie campaign remains one of the legendary storylines from 2001, but his exploits had an unwanted impact on his Sauber team-mate’s own prospects. Twenty years on from his first F1 podium at the Brazilian GP, here’s how Nick Heidfeld’s career was chilled by the Iceman

Formula 1
Apr 1, 2021