F1 testing: Was week one a waste of time? Fans' verdicts

Barcelona this week hosted the first of only two four-day Formula 1 pre-season tests before the opening round in Melbourne on March 25 - but it was far from productive

F1 testing: Was week one a waste of time? Fans' verdicts

The weather ensured even less testing time than usual for the teams. Low track temperatures, heavy rain and some snow reduced the opportunities to do meaningful running and the track was empty for long periods.

A mooted extra test day did not happen because the required unanimous support from the 10 teams was not achieved.

Fans on the Autosport Forums debated what, if anything, could have been done differently:

Raest: How much more expensive would it be to fly to Bahrain or Abu Dhabi compared to Barcelona? It's the only testing session they have prior to Australia, surely they could afford to spend a bit more and maximise returns...

hahostolze: Yes moving the test to a different place would be expensive and logistically difficult, but surely spending all that money on a test that doesn't tell you much about your car is an even bigger waste of money?

Seanspeed: It's not just flying people, it's flying all the equipment and everything, too. I imagine the costs aren't minor.

Noikeee: It was a giant anomaly, it never snows at the track.

CoolBreeze: Pre-season tests should be fully sponsored by the FIA. They should pick a really nice warm country and then sponsor the teams to move all equipment and test there.

Andy35: The FIA needs to bring an entire continent into it by testing in South Africa and then doing the first race there.

AustinF1: Even though getting snow or even rain isn't usually a problem in Barcelona, how about just allowing for at least one bad weather day? When scheduling the test, simply tell the teams they'll be allowed to do four days of testing over a specified five or six-day span.

clarkma5: Quite disappointing teams couldn't come together to move the test day. I know a couple of teams had the track booked but there were enough free days to shuffle things around.

It seems a couple of teams decided to save themselves the trouble of rescheduling instead of helping the whole sport. I'm a little tired of that attitude in F1.

Quickshifter: This whole 100% unanimity requirement for even simple things like shifting a lost test day indicates what is wrong with F1. Teams have way too much say in the running of the sport. I hope it changes from 2021.

pdac: There should be a hard timetable and if something untoward happens to disrupt it, so be it. You can't just allow the ones that have flexibility to throw away agreements.

Join the debate on the Autosport Forums

SCUDmissile: Why can't teams test separately again? Let them test wherever they want but give them a limit of how many 9-5 days of running.

Seanspeed: Parity. So bigger teams can't go testing at ideal locations, getting better information and more running than smaller teams stuck in Europe with more problems.

Burai: Since the rules were changed that tests need to have the same safety and medical facilities as a race, the cost has skyrocketed.

It makes far more sense for Force India to chip in one tenth of the cost and ship cars and personnel out than it does for them to swallow 100% of the cost to use Silverstone.

It also means that the FIA, Pirelli, FOM, broadcasters, etc. don't need staff in five different places at once.

ArrowsLivery: I don't think testing is that big of a deal anymore. These teams all have supercomputers which do all the heavy lifting with regards to set-ups and simulations. The tests are just to make sure there isn't any mistakes in fitting all the pieces of the car together and that all the correlations are in order.

amedeofelix: They are, as Gary Anderson pointed out, all imbeciles for not testing the wet tyres!

Knowlesy: The less knowledge they have of their cars the better. More snow please!

shares
comments
F1 testing: Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton send early warning
Previous article

F1 testing: Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton send early warning

Next article

10 things we learned from the first F1 test

10 things we learned from the first F1 test
The pioneering pair who brought a new glory era to an F1 heavyweight  Plus

The pioneering pair who brought a new glory era to an F1 heavyweight 

With the team’s founder now retired and a new boss at the helm, change was coming to Brabham – change that would shape the future of Formula 1. In the third part of our four-part history of Brabham, DAMIEN SMITH examines the effect Bernie Ecclestone had on the team

The combination behind the Silverstone racing battles Hamilton called "F1 at its best" Plus

The combination behind the Silverstone racing battles Hamilton called "F1 at its best"

OPINION: The late battling in the British Grand Prix wowed Formula 1 fans and surely represents the best racing action of the season so far. And there was a cocktail of factors that created the action, from which Carlos Sainz emerged as a popular new winner

How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine Plus

How Ferrari’s Monaco headache became its Silverstone migraine

OPINION: Ferrari won the British Grand Prix with Carlos Sainz, but it ultimately cost Charles Leclerc a chance to make a bigger dent in Max Verstappen's title lead by leaving the Monegasque out on old tyres towards the end. Like Monaco, indecision over strategy proved to be the Scuderia's biggest issue - and if the team doesn't reflect, the headache can only intensify

Formula 1
Jul 5, 2022
The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost Plus

The five factors behind Sainz winning a British GP he’d twice lost

Formula 1 has a newest race winner, in a grand prix the victor appeared to have lost twice, only to charge back to headline a sensational and dramatic British Grand Prix. From a massive start crash to a late sprint finish, here’s how five factors saw Carlos Sainz take his maiden grand prix win

Formula 1
Jul 4, 2022
Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga Plus

Why there was no case to answer in Aston’s latest F1 copycat saga

The appearance of a revised Aston Martin in Spain caused controversy but PAT SYMONDS explains why the FIA investigation found the Silverstone team had no case to answer

Formula 1
Jul 3, 2022
Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone Plus

Why it's Red Bull that really leads a three-way fight so far at Silverstone

After a slow start to Friday at Silverstone, all the Formula 1 teams had to effectively cram in a day’s worth of practice into one hour. But there was still plenty to learn and while Ferrari topped the times, a three-way battle is brewing ahead of the British Grand Prix

Formula 1
Jul 2, 2022
Why the future is bright for the British GP Plus

Why the future is bright for the British GP

It wasn’t so long ago the situation looked bleak at Silverstone with the future of the British Grand Prix under threat. But a transformation has seen it restored to one of the most important races on the Formula 1 calendar, with bigger and better to come

Formula 1
Jul 1, 2022
Could mixed fortunes for F1's leading Brits turn around at Silverstone? Plus

Could mixed fortunes for F1's leading Brits turn around at Silverstone?

For the first time in many years, none of the local racers starts among the favourites for the British Grand Prix. But George Russell, Lewis Hamilton and Lando Norris could have reasons for optimism

Formula 1
Jun 30, 2022