F1 outlines how ballast could work instead of engine grid penalties

Formula 1's exploration of alternatives to grid penalties has led to an outline of how ballast could be used instead, but the idea has been questioned by some drivers

F1 outlines how ballast could work instead of engine grid penalties

F1 caps the number of engine components drivers can use during the season in an attempt to contain development costs, with grid penalties used as a punishment should a driver exceed those limits.

But this method has been criticised during the V6 turbo-hybrid era, particularly as the specific limits introduced with the new engines in 2014 have since become even stricter.

Recent meetings between F1's rulemakers have looked at potential options to replace grid penalties.

F1 has now used its Fan Voice service to outline, for the first time, how ballast could be used instead.

Fan Voice is a service F1 uses to get opinions from fans on various topic, including potential rule changes, and was used last December to offer hints at possible alternatives to grid penalties.

F1's explanation for its call to fans regarding using ballast came after "much debate and many alternatives considered", the service said.

It has boiled these options down to two: keeping things as they are, or adding ballast to cars instead.

Though the existing grid penalty system is unpopular it is well understood, while F1 also acknowledges it provides scope for out-of-position cars to fight through the field.

But it is also noted that grid penalties for one rule infringement often leads teams to "make further strategic changes, which is outside the spirit of the regulations".

When ballast emerged as a potential alternative last year, it was initially suggested for use only in qualifying.

But F1 has now indicated its use could be "graduated depending on the seriousness of the offence - for example 5kg for a turbocharger change, and 15kg for an engine change".

The idea is this would be calculated to "give a similar end of race effect to the current grid penalties".

It is considered a "simple" solution that would allow cars to start where they qualify, eliminating confusion when multiple cars have penalties in the same race.

But it has been noted that responsibility for fans understanding the situation would be put on race commentators, otherwise "it may leave spectators wondering why a driver is slow" or may "show a driver as being slower than his team-mate when this is not necessarily the case".

The idea has been met with scepticism by drivers. When Asked by Autosport about using ballast, McLaren driver Carlos Sainz Jr said: "It goes against what Formula 1 needs at the moment.

"You would make the opposite. Honda and Renault, if they keep taking penalties, using four or five engines, would have slightly less performance than Ferrari already, plus 20kg of ballast. I don't see the point."

Eliminating a penalty for engine usage is not an option F1 is considering because this would reward teams that could afford to use more and increase the cost for smaller teams to do the same.

Ballast has also been described as a "bandage" for F1's real problems by Toro Rosso driver Daniil Kvyat.

"I just think there shouldn't be penalties," said Kvyat.

"Maybe now if they see people are struggling with three engines per year, maybe increase this to five, let's say. "OK, teams worked for three, but no one will get penalties.

"Yeah, there is a little bit increased cost, but at least we get a fair representative [all] year with no penalties."

shares
comments
FIA insists on extra Formula 1 test amid 2020 Pirelli tyre dilemma

Previous article

FIA insists on extra Formula 1 test amid 2020 Pirelli tyre dilemma

Next article

Renault wants time penalties instead of grid drops in Formula 1

Renault wants time penalties instead of grid drops in Formula 1
Load comments
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots Plus

The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots

Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background Plus

Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background

OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus Plus

How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus

Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline

Formula 1
Sep 21, 2021
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey  Plus

The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey 

Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…

Formula 1
Sep 20, 2021
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog Plus

The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog

A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING

Formula 1
Sep 18, 2021
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from Plus

The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from

OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences

Formula 1
Sep 17, 2021
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum Plus

How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum

With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...

Formula 1
Sep 16, 2021
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season? Plus

Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?

OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects

Formula 1
Sep 15, 2021