Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How Scotland ended the WRC’s seven-year GB hiatus

Feature
WRC
How Scotland ended the WRC’s seven-year GB hiatus

How IndyCar's shiny new event provided a challenger to Palou's throne

Feature
IndyCar
Streets of Arlington
How IndyCar's shiny new event provided a challenger to Palou's throne

How Katsuta realised a WRC dream in the most brutal modern Safari Rally

Feature
WRC
Rally Kenya
How Katsuta realised a WRC dream in the most brutal modern Safari Rally

No F1 rule changes ahead of Japan, but Wolff remains wary of ‘political knives’

Formula 1
Japanese GP
No F1 rule changes ahead of Japan, but Wolff remains wary of ‘political knives’

Chinese Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Chinese GP
Chinese Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

The grim start warning Formula 1 seems to have missed

Feature
Formula 1
Chinese GP
The grim start warning Formula 1 seems to have missed

What’s behind the “horror show” for Red Bull and Verstappen in China?

Feature
Formula 1
Chinese GP
What’s behind the “horror show” for Red Bull and Verstappen in China?

Porsche pays dearly for Rolex 24 win: BoP analysis Sebring 12 Hours 2026

Feature
IMSA
Sebring 12 Hours
Porsche pays dearly for Rolex 24 win: BoP analysis Sebring 12 Hours 2026

F1 News: Turbo-hybrid powerunit rules too complex, expensive for new manufacturers

Formula 1's turbo-hybrid powertrain regulations are too complex and expensive for any new manufacturers to consider joining the championship, says Motorsport UK chief David Richards

The now-delayed 2022 technical overhaul, originally slated for 2021 before the coronavirus pandemic prompted F1 to defer the changes by a year, only features very minor tweaks to the powertrain regulations.

Although consideration was initially given towards more simplified power units, with the MGU-H looking likely to be dropped altogether, F1 instead elected to retain the same power unit composition.

The only changes to the power unit formula focus on the materials used, which aims to save costs, along with a standard fuel pump used by all teams.

While F1's current manufacturers will benefit from the reduced cost of having to develop new engines, Richards says that the initial cost of development is far too high for a manufacturer to consider - especially in the current climate, with the global economy due to plunge into a recession.

"The investment to get there is just colossal," Richards told Autosport.

"[It's] something that couldn't even be contemplated by the car manufacturers today in the current environment.

"You'd have to take a couple of steps backwards before it would be even feasible for someone to invest the money that's required to get on par with the current engine suppliers.

"Those bits of equipment have the most sophisticated internal combustion engines that have ever been built."

Richards also says that the technical regulations themselves limits any independent manufacturers from developing their own turbo-hybrid systems, especially without external investment.

Cosworth was the last independent manufacturer to enter F1 as an engine supplier, having rejoined the championship for the 2010 season with heavy backing from Bernie Ecclestone and the FIA.

Once the turbo-hybrid regulations became part of F1 in 2014, Cosworth withdrew having lacked the budget to produce its own power unit - particularly as its sole partner team remaining, Marussia, signed a supply deal with Ferrari.

When asked if F1 could feasibly introduce an independent power unit supplier again, Richards said: "Not with the technical rules as they are today, they're just too complicated and too complex."

Previous article Autosport 70: The rise and fall of Ferrari's first great champion
Next article F1 News: Leclerc completes remake of controversial driving film in Monaco

Top Comments