Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

National
Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Feature
IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Canadian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
How Ferrari and Audi could decide Verstappen's F1 future

Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Feature
Formula 1
Canadian GP
Antonelli takes a decisive step in Montreal's all-action thriller

Drivers urge caution over rules shake-up

There has been a lukewarm reaction among grand prix drivers to a raft of possible changes that could totally revamp Formula 1 in the future

Among the most exciting - and fanciful - is the suggestion that drivers would actually have to swap cars throughout the season in an attempt to create a level playing field and a genuine drivers' championship.

Drivers would be contracted to the FIA rather than to teams, and as well as generating enormous interest on a week-to-week basis, it would drive down salaries as a driver's main income could then be generated directly via his performances. Success ballast is another potential development.

"I know that there have been speculative ideas, some of them a bit silly," McLaren's David Coulthard said in Japan today (Thursday). "But thought is what is required. The knee-jerk reaction of putting in ballast and trying to handicap those that have done a better job, to improve the show, I don't think is right. I think it goes against what F1 stands for, which is a set of regulations rewarding the cleverest minds and the best budgets do the best job."

British American Racing's Olivier Panis joked: "Well, I definitely want to swap my car with Rubens' [Barrichello] but I don't think he'd want that! But I feel sure we need something, but it's very complicated. I think it would be quite a good idea if the drivers spoke with Max [Mosley] and Bernie [Ecclestone] maybe, because there will be different ideas. Also, we need to be fair to the best teams. I don't think ballast is the answer."

Previous article Brawn to go 'virtual' for Suzuka
Next article Irvine, Montoya Reject Seat-Swapping Proposal

Top Comments