Bernie defends Brit GP decision

Formula 1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone has defended his decision to drop the British Grand Prix from next year's schedule and claimed that if he had accepted a cut-price offer to host the race then it would have been unfair on other venues paying a top-rate fee for their events

Bernie defends Brit GP decision

Ecclestone insisted that the decision he has taken was not motivated by personal greed to get as much money as possible, but was purely because he had to maintain a certain rate-card with venues - and he had already done as much as he could do to accommodate Silverstone.

It is understood that the BRDC offered Ecclestone $10 million per year to be promoters of the race, about $6 million less than Ecclestone was after. Another reason Ecclestone chose to reject the deal was that he was after a seven-year contract, whereas the BRDC was only willing to commit for three years.

"I have given them their chances for years," said a defiant Ecclestone. "I even offered to go into a joint venture deal with them to help out, but they refused that. I try to be fair and honest with everybody but I cannot give Silverstone what they want because that isn't fair to the other circuits around the world.

"The deal I offered them was already on the old terms and the cheapest in Europe and the rest of the world. It was a really super deal. We have gone along with them for a long time but I couldn't do any more. They don't want to take a risk. In fact, they don't want to do anything that doesn't suit them."

Ecclestone made comparisons between Silverstone's plight, where he would not receive a top-rate fee for a venue that he is not completely happy with, and Shanghai, which paid top whack and provided a state-of-the-art facility.

"We took a lot of time over Shanghai, getting the deal right and the people there went and built this magnificent circuit," explained Ecclestone. "Turkey next year will be great as well. You can't go around the world asking people to build these terrific facilities and then we have this thing back in England called Silverstone that we are ashamed of.

"Obviously, I regret that we can't have a British Grand Prix but this is a commercial deal and I have to be fair to everybody, not just Silverstone."

Speaking about the specifics of the deal, Ecclestone claimed that the BRDC could have done more to help save the race - and believed there was plenty of room for the club to make a profit hosting the British Grand Prix.

He added: "They came to me with a letter which more or less said, 'take it or leave it'. The obvious thing they should know is that when they say that to me, that is an opportunity to leave it. They say they can't make money out of it, but they have admitted they have made £8 million or £10 million out of the race in the past.

"I put up a third of the money for the improvements at the circuit and all they did was build car parks. That's it. They paid nothing for the circuit in the first place and they are saying they can raise £150 million by selling half the land. I don't know where all the money goes.

"I want to deal with a commercial organisation, not a gentleman's club, which is what has been happening at Silverstone for far too long."

The BRDC is still hoping that a last-minute intervention can save the race before the provisional 2005 calendar is issued at a meeting of the FIA World Council in Paris on October 13.

But, with France also set to be axed from the schedule, the difficulty both races will face in finding a way back onto the calendar is that they will now be the 18th race - which means they must come up with extra cash to pay the teams for competing there.

The Concorde Agreement, the document by which F1 is run, puts a limit of 17 races in a season. Any extra can only be added if the teams are unanimous in their support - which usually means they must be given financial compensation.

Having been unable to afford the race in the first place, this means getting even more finances on board will be virtually impossible for both Silverstone and Magny-Cours.

Bernie accused of money focus
Previous article

Bernie accused of money focus

Next article

Hill: Silverstone Should be Treated Like Ferrari

Hill: Silverstone Should be Treated Like Ferrari
Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022? Plus

Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?

Who was the fastest driver in 2022? Everyone has an opinion, but what does the stopwatch say? Obviously, differing car performance has an effect on ultimate laptime – but it’s the relative speed of each car/driver package that’s fascinating and enlightening says ALEX KALINAUCKAS

Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return Plus

Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return

He has more starts without a podium than anyone else in Formula 1 world championship history, but Nico Hulkenberg is back for one more shot with Haas. After spending three years on the sidelines, the revitalised German is aiming to prove to his new team what the F1 grid has been missing

Formula 1
Jan 29, 2023
The potential-laden F1 car that Ferrari neglected Plus

The potential-laden F1 car that Ferrari neglected

The late Mauro Forghieri played a key role in Ferrari’s mid-1960s turnaround, says STUART CODLING, and his pretty, intricate 1512 was among the most evocative cars of the 1.5-litre era. But a victim of priorities as Formula 1 was deemed less lucrative than success in sportscars, its true potential was never seen in period

Formula 1
Jan 28, 2023
Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss Plus

Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss

OPINION: Fred Vasseur has spent only a few weeks as team principal for the Ferrari Formula 1 team, but is already intent on taking the Scuderia back to the very top. And despite it being arguably the most demanding job in motorsport, the Frenchman is relishing the challenge

Formula 1
Jan 27, 2023
The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023 Plus

The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023

Changes to the regulations for season two of Formula 1's ground-effects era aim to smooth out last year’s troubles and shut down loopholes. But what areas have been targeted, and what impact will this have?

Formula 1
Jan 26, 2023
Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history? Plus

Are these the 50 quickest drivers in F1 history?

Who are the quickest drivers in Formula 1 history? LUKE SMITH asked a jury of experienced and international panel of experts and F1 insiders. Some of them have worked closely with F1’s fastest-ever drivers – so who better to vote on our all-time top 50? We’re talking all-out speed here rather than size of trophy cabinet, so the results may surprise you…

Formula 1
Jan 25, 2023
One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1 Plus

One easy way the FIA could instantly improve F1

OPINION: During what is traditionally a very quiet time of year in the Formula 1 news cycle, FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem has been generating headlines. He’s been commenting on massive topics in a championship that loves them, but also addressing necessary smaller changes too. Here we suggest a further refinement that would be a big boon to fans

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023
How can McLaren keep hold of Norris? Plus

How can McLaren keep hold of Norris?

Lando Norris is no longer the young cheeky-chappy at McLaren; he’s now the established ace. And F1's big guns will come calling if the team can’t give him a competitive car. Here's what the team needs to do to retain its prize asset

Formula 1
Jan 24, 2023