Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Norris: I was better than Piastri in every sense in battle for Hungarian GP victory

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Norris: I was better than Piastri in every sense in battle for Hungarian GP victory

Ogier to reunite with WRC champion co-driver for Rally Finland

WRC
Rally Finland
Ogier to reunite with WRC champion co-driver for Rally Finland

Hungarian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Hungarian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

How Ferrari's Hungarian GP meltdown cost a shot at the F1 podium

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
How Ferrari's Hungarian GP meltdown cost a shot at the F1 podium

Where to next after the Bahraysian Grand Prix?

Feature
Formula 1
Bahrain GP
Where to next after the Bahraysian Grand Prix?

What McLaren thought of Piastri's explosive F1 Hungarian GP radio outburst

Formula 1
Hungarian GP
What McLaren thought of Piastri's explosive F1 Hungarian GP radio outburst

How Norris shrugged off his first-lap error to deliver on McLaren's Hungarian GP pace

Feature
Formula 1
Hungarian GP
How Norris shrugged off his first-lap error to deliver on McLaren's Hungarian GP pace

BTCC Thruxton: Ingram wins race three despite penalty to cut into Sutton’s lead

BTCC
Thruxton
BTCC Thruxton: Ingram wins race three despite penalty to cut into Sutton’s lead

Attempt to block F1 Miami Grand Prix dismissed by judge

The court challenge by local residents to halt the inaugural Miami Grand Prix on the grounds of damage to hearing due to noise from the event has been denied.

Miami track overview

This clears the final roadblock for the event to take place as planned at the Hard Rock Stadium site in Miami Gardens on 6-8 May.

Judge Alan Fine, who was being asked to grant a special hearing that would block the race from happening, found that “any potential harm is avoidable” in terms of hearing damage – despite the plaintiffs bringing forth new evidence as requested.

“The bottom line here is I’m not going to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing prior to 6 May,” Fine said. He then listed a series of reasons why that “compelled” him to make the decision.

“Two are more important than the rest,” he added. “Although the burden may seem unfair to the plaintiffs [the residents], I do find that any potential harm is avoidable.

“In combination with that, the evidence proffered so far regarding the potential hearing loss is, in my view, very highly speculative.

"It is not based on any current Formula 1 noise information, and the most recent affidavit from overnight does not take into consideration the south wall [a noise barrier previously erected at the venue].”

Miami track overview

Miami track overview

Photo by: Charles Bradley

Judge Fine also ruled that the belated date of this lawsuit, lodged on 21 March, also had a bearing on his decision.

“The other co-equal reason is the delay in bringing this action in seeking injunctive relief,” he added.

“I’m not persuaded by the legal soundness of waiting to file until a special events permit was issued.”

Read Also:

Judge Fine did not rule out scope for further court proceedings after the race occurs in 2022, adding that he would expect a “full-blown evidentiary hearing in four-five months” after the 8 May race takes place.

Sound monitoring will be carried out by the stadium, as part of its obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding that is part of the event’s contract with the city.

The judge also ordered that one of these sites must be located in or near residential areas.

Previous article Alfa Romeo F1 team to introduce revised floor at Imola
Next article Ferrari extends Sainz's F1 deal to the end of 2024

Top Comments