Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Super Formula Fuji: Ohta charge denies O’Sullivan maiden win

Super Formula
Fuji
Super Formula Fuji: Ohta charge denies O’Sullivan maiden win

Rovanpera provides comeback update during Rally Estonia visit

WRC
Rally Estonia
Rovanpera provides comeback update during Rally Estonia visit

The surprise highest points scorer in MotoGP's European leg

MotoGP
The surprise highest points scorer in MotoGP's European leg

How Colapinto has survived and thrived in the hothouse intensity of F1

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
How Colapinto has survived and thrived in the hothouse intensity of F1

Why Hamilton sees Mercedes as ‘still the team to beat’ at Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Why Hamilton sees Mercedes as ‘still the team to beat’ at Belgian GP

WRC Estonia: Unbeatable Pajari leads after perfect Friday

WRC
Rally Estonia
WRC Estonia: Unbeatable Pajari leads after perfect Friday

"Not getting ahead of ourselves" - Why Norris was downbeat in Belgium despite F1 practice pace

Formula 1
Belgian GP
"Not getting ahead of ourselves" - Why Norris was downbeat in Belgium despite F1 practice pace

Alpine explains Gasly's crash that red-flagged FP2

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Alpine explains Gasly's crash that red-flagged FP2

Attempt to block F1 Miami Grand Prix dismissed by judge

The court challenge by local residents to halt the inaugural Miami Grand Prix on the grounds of damage to hearing due to noise from the event has been denied.

Miami track overview

This clears the final roadblock for the event to take place as planned at the Hard Rock Stadium site in Miami Gardens on 6-8 May.

Judge Alan Fine, who was being asked to grant a special hearing that would block the race from happening, found that “any potential harm is avoidable” in terms of hearing damage – despite the plaintiffs bringing forth new evidence as requested.

“The bottom line here is I’m not going to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing prior to 6 May,” Fine said. He then listed a series of reasons why that “compelled” him to make the decision.

“Two are more important than the rest,” he added. “Although the burden may seem unfair to the plaintiffs [the residents], I do find that any potential harm is avoidable.

“In combination with that, the evidence proffered so far regarding the potential hearing loss is, in my view, very highly speculative.

"It is not based on any current Formula 1 noise information, and the most recent affidavit from overnight does not take into consideration the south wall [a noise barrier previously erected at the venue].”

Miami track overview

Miami track overview

Photo by: Charles Bradley

Judge Fine also ruled that the belated date of this lawsuit, lodged on 21 March, also had a bearing on his decision.

“The other co-equal reason is the delay in bringing this action in seeking injunctive relief,” he added.

“I’m not persuaded by the legal soundness of waiting to file until a special events permit was issued.”

Read Also:

Judge Fine did not rule out scope for further court proceedings after the race occurs in 2022, adding that he would expect a “full-blown evidentiary hearing in four-five months” after the 8 May race takes place.

Sound monitoring will be carried out by the stadium, as part of its obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding that is part of the event’s contract with the city.

The judge also ordered that one of these sites must be located in or near residential areas.

Previous article Alfa Romeo F1 team to introduce revised floor at Imola
Next article Ferrari extends Sainz's F1 deal to the end of 2024

Top Comments