Ask Damien Smith: February 26

Our Grand Prix Editor Nigel Roebuck is on holiday this week, so AUTOSPORT's News Editor Damien Smith is making a guest appearance. Nigel will be back next week, so if you want his opinion on any motorsport matter drop us an e-mail here at and we'll forward on a selection to him. Nigel won't be able to answer all your questions, but we'll publish his answers here next week

Ask Damien Smith: February 26

Send your questions to

Dear Andrew,

The short answer to the question of whether Sebastien Bourdais should be in Formula 1 is yes, of course he should. The Frenchman has a proven track record already and what is likely to be a great Champ Car season for him this year will only strengthen what he has already built.

Bourdais could well have ended up racing for Arrows this year, if the team had survived its financial problems. Tom Walkinshaw had signed him on a contract last year - just as it became clear at the British Grand Prix that his team was on the brink of falling apart. Then Renault looked set to take Bourdais under its wing as a test driver. But despite the added advantage of his nationality, Sebastien was overlooked.

Bourdais is not feeling sorry for himself. He has landed arguably the best drive outside of F1 with Newman-Haas, and as he is already showing, he intends to make the best of it. Yes, it is a shame that Bourdais could not graduate straight to F1 after winning the Formula 3000 International Championship, but I don't believe the fact that he hasn't is necessarily a reflection of him or the feeder category. There is a strong random element to landing an F1 drive. So much has to come together for it to come off, and winning any championship is unfortunately not enough to guarantee anything.

Bourdais' time in F1 will come, just as it has for Ralph Firman, Justin Wilson and last year's CART champion Cristiano da Matta this year. Remember, a couple of years in Champ Cars did no harm to Juan Pablo Montoya. The variety of disciplines demanded of CART drivers can only be positive when it comes to racing experience.

If he does get picked up by an F1 team in the next couple of years, he will be the complete package. Bourdais has a great junior record, three years of F3000 experience, a win in the Spa 24 Hours, a great knowledge of sportscar racing and the Le Mans 24 Hours and obvious talent and intelligence. F1 is not the be-all-and-end-all. Sebastien knows that and is looking forward to his Champ Car season. He might be a rookie in these circles, but this guy is a seasoned professional at the age of just 23.

Dear Terry,

It depends what criteria you set. On top of the technical and strategic reasons, smaller teams like Jordan and Minardi hope to gain marketing benefits from the two-hour testing sessions on the Friday mornings of grands prix. They hope to gain from the exposure of being the focus of attention for those couple of hours, and third cars possibly driven by rising stars local to each particular races would add to that.

But it has to questionable just how much marketing mileage there is out of the test sessions. Of course, the main advantage is the extra track time the teams will gain to prepare for qualifying and the race. Now that the tyre companies have agreed to supply the Friday teams with only the same rubber as the other teams, some of that advantage is gone. But losing the right to unlimited testing away from events is still a price worth paying for some teams.

Rookie drivers will clearly benefit from the extra track time on grand prix weekends. The pressure of one-shot qualifying will be tough on the new drivers, but if they have two extra hours to prepare, they should be less likely to make mistakes. So Jaguar's Antonio Pizzonia, Jordan's Ralph Firman, Minardi's Justin Wilson and Renault's Fernando Alonso, who has not raced in F1 for over a year, will all gain from it.

Jaguar has permission to test for 20 days away from races during the season, as long as it only runs one car in these sessions. Twenty days was exactly what it had budgeted for anyway, so the team argues it does not lose anything from the Friday option and can only gain. Likewise, the cash-strapped Jordan and Minardi teams would not be able to afford much testing this year anyway. It makes complete sense for them to test at races.

The same goes for Sauber, if it becomes the fifth team to sign up. The Swiss outfit has set a pattern of starting most F1 seasons strongly, but a lack of development usually means the promise begins to tail off. Its reputation as a solid midfielder is assured. With extra on-track preparation at races, Sauber could find enough performance every now and again to be more than a consistent points finisher, especially with the strong driver line-up of Heinz-Harald Frentzen and Nick Heidfeld.

Rather than pinpoint who has the most to gain from Friday testing, it is actually easier to suggest who has the most to lose. It has to be Renault. This team can undoubtedly afford to clock up as many testing miles during a season as it wants. It has already admitted that its V10 engine is not as strong as it should be and needs work. Can the addition of Allan McNish on the driving strength for Fridays really provide enough development time for a team with the high expectations of Renault? We can only wait and see.

Dear Jenny,

There is clearly the possibility of that happening. Personally, I don't agree with the new points system. Firstly, I've always believed a world championship point is something that should be hard-earned and extremely valuable. By making it easier to score points this year, their worth is diminished. In sporting terms, it will mean no more to me if Minardi scores 10 points this year by racking up sevenths and eighths than the two points they scored last year through Mark Webber's heroic fifth place in Australia. Financially, it might work out better for the team, but I'm still disappointed that championship points will be easier to come by.

Secondly, the new system will screw up the record books. Ok, if Michael Schumacher beat his points record from last year it would still count because what you get for a win hasn't changed. But for those midfield teams who will score more than usual this year, the points barometer indicating how successful their season has been compared to others will be useless. Maybe stats are only interesting to the anoraks, but I happen to think it's important.

So who will benefit the most? Well, there are a number of teams who could gain, aren't there? The biggest jump in performance this year could come from Toyota, if the winter tests are anything to go by. Williams believes that on pace, the red and white cars could be the third best outfit at the start of the year. But if this is the case, Toyota would gain whatever the points system.

Those who will really gain are the teams who usually can expect to finish only fourth at best in most grands prix. The likes of Jaguar, Sauber, Renault and BAR are the teams I'm thinking of. And if Toyota's leap in performance is not as great as it could be, they are part of that list too.

But I suppose the team that will gain the most is Minardi, because the chances of it scoring points this year are higher than they have ever been. The others listed would all expect to get into double figures anyway; Minardi has always thought of points as a bonus. As I say, their worth to me as a racing fan is much less if they are earned through seventh and eighth place finishers. But I'm sure Paul Stoddart and his drivers will take them any way they come.

Dear Steve,

It's a bit depressing, isn't it? Just as the excitement is building up for a potentially exciting Formula 1 season, politics rears its head once again.

The good news is that the arbitration process will take over a year to be concluded and the new rules will be introduced in Australia next week. Whether you agree with the various changes or not, the best thing about them is that they have introduced so many new variables to F1, it really is hard to know exactly what the Melbourne weekend will be like. It's interesting again.

Having said that, it is not fair to label Ron Dennis and Frank Williams as simply dinosaurs out of step with the rest of F1. They have every right to argue their case. And judging by a vote on earlier this week, many of our readers seem to agree with them.

As you say, Dennis and Williams are two of the "keenest racers" in the paddock and their commitment to F1 cannot be questioned. They believe that Max Mosley and the FIA are taking F1 down a rocky road, and are not prepared to sit back and let this new direction take its course without a fight. You have to admire them for standing by their convictions.

And who is to say they are not right? The FIA is doing its best to steer F1 into a stable long-term future, but how will all this look in hindsight? We can't know that right now. Dennis and Williams might be spot on in doubting these ideas.

But as it stands now, we are fast approaching what will be one of the most intriguing F1 seasons ever. I believe the rules will make grand prix racing more interesting, more entertaining. After the tough time F1 went through last year, it is vital to bring back the spark that so many believe has been lost. Let's enjoy watching what happens in the next few months, and leave the politics to sort itself out away from what matters: the races.

Dear Paul,

There was a time when Luca Badoer looked set to be one of the new star names of the 1990s. When he was winning Formula 3000 races and the championship in 1992 with Team Crypton, this Italian looked set for a bright future.

So what happened? He joined Scuderia Italia in F1 the following year, that's what. The dreadful Lola-Ferraris almost ended his career there and then. He re-emerged with Minardi in '95, then made another disastrous career decision by joining Forti Corse in '96.

After that debacle, the test driver role at Ferrari must have been extremely attractive. Although he put in another stint at Minardi, Badoer has been doing that job ever since.

For a long time it seemed as if he was patiently waiting in the wings for Ferrari to give him a proper chance in F1. But when that appeared to come up when Michael Schumacher broke his leg at Silverstone in '99, the team brought in Mika Salo instead. Badoer was deeply disappointed.

Since then, Badoer must have accepted that he is never going to land that big chance in F1. Instead, he has settled for job security. Badoer's ability makes him a perfect Ferrari test driver, a job where you get to drive the best F1 cars without the pressure of having to perform. His loyalty to Ferrari is impressive, even if he must pay the price of losing the best years of his racing career.

Dear Craig,

Formula 3000 is not in the best of health, and if truth be told, has not been for some time. Only 10 teams look set to race this year and not all of them are in the best of shape.

Meanwhile, the Dallara Nissan World Series is heading into its second season and is seemingly in good health. But take a closer look and you will see that the two championships are in pretty similar shape.

Both are only just into double figures in terms of drivers actually signed for this year. But there is still time for more drivers to join. F3000 continues to run without a title sponsorship and prize money, but the carrot of a prestigious Formula 1 support slot, while Dallara Nissan is currently searching for a new title sponsor to replace Telefonica and boasts a calendar of races that makes it attractive to rising stars and Formula 1 rejects alike.

Both series have their merits, and both could fall apart in the next few years because that is the reality of trying to run professional race series in the world today. The fact is both would be stronger if they were united.

Just picture it: one series clearly defined as the final stepping stone to F1, running on the grand prix support bill; proper sponsorship and prize money; large grids of well-run teams; and a new chance of catching the imagination of the public thanks to proper marketing.

It won't happen, of course. There are too many parties with their own interests. Dallara Nissan will strive to keep up its momentum, and the F3000 teams will work harder to keep their series afloat. Who knows what is in store for both in the long term? If only motorsport could be simple...

BAR faces decision on new Honda

Previous article

BAR faces decision on new Honda

Next article

Williams Troubled by New Car's Aerodynamics

Williams Troubled by New Car's Aerodynamics
Load comments
Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track' Plus

Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track'

Mercedes ended Friday practice at the Hungaroring with a clear gap to Red Bull thanks to Valtteri Bottas’s pace in topping FP2. But there are other reasons why the Black Arrows squad feels satisfied with its progress so far at a track many Formula 1 observers reckon favours Red Bull overall

How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks Plus

How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks

OPINION: Red Bull was justified to be upset that Lewis Hamilton survived his British GP clash with Max Verstappen and went on to win. But its attempts to lobby the FIA to reconsider the severity of Hamilton's in-race penalty were always likely to backfire, and have only succeeded in creating a PR disaster that will distract from its on-track efforts

The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach Plus

The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach

OPINION: It wasn't just the Verstappen/Hamilton clash that had the Red Bull and Mercedes bosses at loggerheads at Silverstone, with the nature of Formula 1's 2025 engines also subject for disagreement. But hopes to have loud, emotive engines that are also environmentally friendly don't have to be opposed

Formula 1
Jul 29, 2021
The drivers that need to strike gold before F1's summer break Plus

The drivers that need to strike gold before F1's summer break

OPINION: Formula 1 is about to break up for summer 2021, with the title battles finely poised. But it’s not just the latest round of Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton that will be worth watching this weekend in Hungary, as plenty of drivers are eying big results to change the stories of their seasons so far

Formula 1
Jul 28, 2021
How Lotus F1 uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’ Plus

How Lotus F1 uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’

Cast in the mould of its founder Colin Chapman, Lotus was powerful and daring but 
flawed – as it proved through further soaring peaks and painful troughs into the 1980s. DAMIEN SMITH examines a game-changing era

Formula 1
Jul 27, 2021
The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address Plus

The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address

OPINION: Changes to the layout of Abu Dhabi’s circuit aim to reverse the trend of insipid Formula 1 races there - the promoter has even described one of the new corners as “iconic”. And that, argues STUART CODLING, is one of this venue’s abiding failings

Formula 1
Jul 26, 2021
How Ferrari offered Britain's next F1 prospect what Red Bull couldn't Plus

How Ferrari offered Britain's next F1 prospect what Red Bull couldn't

Last year's Formula 2 runner-up Callum Ilott could be on his way to becoming the first Briton to contest a grand prix in an Alfa Romeo since Reg Parnell in 1950. But, says OLEG KARPOV, the Ferrari Driver Academy protege is having to temper his ambition at the moment – outwardly at least…

Formula 1
Jul 25, 2021
The signs that point to F1's rude health Plus

The signs that point to F1's rude health

OPINION: Formula 1's calendar might still be facing disruption as the pandemic affects travel but, says MARK GALLAGHER, the business itself is fundamentally strong thanks to the epic rivalry taking place on track and the consistent arrival of new sponsors

Formula 1
Jul 24, 2021