Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

From the archive: When Niki Lauda led an F1 driver strike in 1982

Feature
Formula 1
From the archive: When Niki Lauda led an F1 driver strike in 1982

'Antonelli and Sinner, Sinner and Antonelli' - Italy should handle its latest sporting hero with care

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
'Antonelli and Sinner, Sinner and Antonelli' - Italy should handle its latest sporting hero with care

Sky Sports extends F1 live broadcast contract

Formula 1
Miami GP
Sky Sports extends F1 live broadcast contract

The intrigue sparked by Red Bull's Miami sidepod design

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
The intrigue sparked by Red Bull's Miami sidepod design

MotoGP confident it will "reach an agreement" with manufacturers over commercial cycle

MotoGP
Catalan GP
MotoGP confident it will "reach an agreement" with manufacturers over commercial cycle

How over the course of two decades GT3 became modern motorsport’s greatest success

Feature
GT
How over the course of two decades GT3 became modern motorsport’s greatest success

Why time is running out to make bigger F1 power unit changes for 2027

Formula 1
Miami GP
Why time is running out to make bigger F1 power unit changes for 2027

Where will ‘yo-yo’ F1 racing return?

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
Where will ‘yo-yo’ F1 racing return?

Ferrari wants "clarity and transparency" on F1 car copying rules through appeal

Ferrari hopes to gain "clarity and transparency" from the FIA over the rules on Formula 1 car copying after formalising its appeal in the Racing Point brake duct case

Racing Point was deemed to have copied the design of Mercedes' 2019 brake ducts for its 2020 car following a protest lodged by Renault, resulting in a 15-point constructors' championship penalty and a €400,00 fine.

But the team is allowed to continue using the rear brake ducts for the remainder of the season as the FIA stewards said it could not be expected to unlearn the designs.

Racing Point is appealing the ruling in a bid to overturn the penalty, while both Ferrari and Renault are also proceeding with legal action as they pursue a harsher sanction.

Ask Tim: Why the FIA was right and wrong on Racing Point

While the FIA has confirmed it will clampdown on attempts to copy other cars from next season, Ferrari F1 boss Mattia Binotto said the thrust of his team's appeal was to gain clarity on how intellectual property of teams could be protected.

"The reason why we have confirmed our appeal, I think it's because we need to seek clarification and transparency," Binotto said.

"I think the brake duct is a point, but I think that eventually the decision of the International Court of Appeal open up a more wider and broader discussion on the carbon copy car concept, which for us is important.

"It's important as well for the future of the Formula 1, because at the end it's about discussing intellectual property, and I think that intellectual property is a very important asset of a company.

"If someone would somehow copy almost an identical car of the previous year of a competitor, I think the regulations should somehow protect the competitor itself.

"That's why I think at the moment it's important simply to move forward and understand, [for] clarity, transparency, [and] for the fairness of the competition and for the future of Formula 1 is important."

The FIA's head of single-seaters, Nikolas Tombazis, and FIA secretary general for motorsport Peter Bayer informed teams in the wake of the Racing Point ruling that a similar approach to designing cars would be outlawed from 2021.

Racing Point designed its RP20 car by studying photographs of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes W10 and reverse engineering the concept, resulting in an uplift in form for this year.

Bayer wrote to teams ahead of the Spanish Grand Prix to say that next year's rules would be updated to "expressly prevent teams from using photography or other reverse engineering techniques to copy large parts of other teams' cars".

Ferrari emphasised the importance of teams protecting their intellectual property when defending its decision not to release the details of its engine settlement with the FIA earlier this year.

Previous article Pirelli welcomes F1 downforce cuts for 2021 to help tyre company
Next article Seidl: Mercedes will remain F1 power unit benchmark despite engine mode ban

Top Comments

Latest news