Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Bahrain and Saudi Arabia may still host a grand prix in F1 2026

Formula 1
Why Bahrain and Saudi Arabia may still host a grand prix in F1 2026

Red Bull enjoyed a "step forward" at Miami GP but still behind F1's best

Formula 1
Red Bull enjoyed a "step forward" at Miami GP but still behind F1's best

What would you like to ask Valtteri Bottas?

Formula 1
Canadian GP
What would you like to ask Valtteri Bottas?

Why WEC is in a great place heading into the Le Mans 24 Hours

Feature
WEC
Spa
Why WEC is in a great place heading into the Le Mans 24 Hours

Verstappen’s biggest rivals in the 2026 Nurburgring 24 Hours

NLS
Verstappen’s biggest rivals in the 2026 Nurburgring 24 Hours

As Marquez sinks and Martin surges, Bezzecchi knows exactly who to beat for the MotoGP title

Feature
MotoGP
French GP
As Marquez sinks and Martin surges, Bezzecchi knows exactly who to beat for the MotoGP title

How F1's planned 60-40 power split for 2027 will affect each manufacturer

Feature
Formula 1
How F1's planned 60-40 power split for 2027 will affect each manufacturer

How Rally Portugal served up WRC redemption for Neuville 

Feature
WRC
Rally Portugal
How Rally Portugal served up WRC redemption for Neuville 

Red Bull's F1 fuel supplier calls oil burn process 'backwards'

Formula 1 chiefs have been urged to do more to clamp down on oil burn, even though new rules have done much to discourage teams from exploiting it

With F1's turbo hybrid rules having imposed strict limits on fuel flow and quantity since 2014, engine manufacturers realised that one way to boost power was to use oil in the combustion chamber.

The FIA was on to the matter quickly though and a raft of rule changes - including limits to the amount of oil that can be burned, plus auxiliary tank restrictions - have been designed to discourage the behaviour.

But while further changes are coming in next year, with F1 teams forced to keep their auxiliary oil tanks empty in qualifying, one of the grid's current fuel and lubricants suppliers believes things need to get even stricter.

David Tsurusaki, global motorsports technology manager of ExxonMobil, which supplies Red Bull and sister team Toro Rosso, thinks the limit that allows an engine to burn 0.6-litres of oil per 100 kilometres is out of kilter with what is acceptable in road cars.

"Our view of consuming oil in an internal combustion engine is that it is not the direction that the best in racing and the best in innovation and technology for an engine should be working to," Tsurusaki told Autosport. "That is backwards.

"Our biggest concern is that if they leave the 0.6l per 100km consumption level as is, that means you are allowed to consume that much oil - and that is a lot.

"If you consumed that level of oil in your car, you would have to carry a spare tank of oil around with you!

"The problem is that if you are giving people a number, which we think is a high number, then you are promoting it in a sense for them to find ways to use it because that oil has an energy content."

Tsurusaki welcomed the rule changes coming in for 2019 to try to limit any advantage from oil burn, but thinks F1 would be better off eradicating the practice totally.

"It is not something we have worked on," he said. "We don't work on finding ways to use oil as fuel: we work on using oil as oil and fuel as fuel.

"I know that you do get oil into a combustion chamber on a natural basis - but that is not intentional.

"The more they clamp down on that, the better it should be for the direction of the premier motorsports category.

"It should not be burning oil: it just sounds weird to me."

Previous article McLaren signs Sergio Sette Camara to F1 test and reserve role
Next article Why F1's on the brink of a driver's-eye breakthrough

Top Comments

Latest news