Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Buemi and Di Grassi wrote Formula E’s history, here's how

Formula E
London ePrix I
Buemi and Di Grassi wrote Formula E’s history, here's how

'This is not F1 on two wheels' - Ezpeleta on investment and evolution in MotoGP

MotoGP
British GP
'This is not F1 on two wheels' - Ezpeleta on investment and evolution in MotoGP

Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

Feature
Formula 1
Dutch GP
Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

The Radical rise of a top prototype squad

Feature
National
The Radical rise of a top prototype squad

The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Feature
Formula 1
The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Willmott and Thompson on the move in Autosport National Rankings

National
Willmott and Thompson on the move in Autosport National Rankings

Buemi to leave Formula E after 12 seasons

Formula E
London ePrix I
Buemi to leave Formula E after 12 seasons

Why Cadillac has decided to act now and replace Lowdon with Budkowski

Formula 1
Why Cadillac has decided to act now and replace Lowdon with Budkowski

Ex-FIA man Budkowski: Controversy over my Renault F1 move overblown

Renault technical chief Marcin Budkowski believes the controversy over him joining the Formula 1 outfit from the FIA last year was blown out of proportion by rival teams

Budkowski's signing last October caused uproar among Renault's rivals, which were concerned that the former FIA F1 technical chief would be able to take secrets with him to his new employers.

Following a six month period of gardening leave before he could start work at Enstone, having been restricted to Renault's Viry factory at first, Budkowski said he understood teams' concerns but felt they were overplayed.

"I think it was way overblown," said Budkowski, when asked by Autosport about his reaction to the controversy his move created.

"Yes, I can understand the [teams'] concerns, but I think to be honest there are two things: one is that it was a quiet time in F1.

"There was not much happening, so I think it took proportions that were a little bit too big for what it really was.

"And then it was a little bit instrumental in some of the teams, who added a bit of controversy to it."

While Budkowski's previous work at the FIA gave him privileged access to team factories and understanding their developments, he thinks the pace of progress is so fast in F1 that the value of what he learned has already faded.

"I had three months' notice, and we respected that even further, because we took [an extra] three months in Viry, which were removed from any activity," he added.

"Whether it is enough or not is not for me to say, but I didn't have any conscience issues about that.

"It is moving so quickly in F1, that stuff gets obsolete so quickly and to be honest, the controversial stuff from last year?

"Most of it got banned anyway. All of the exotic suspension systems etc, they were all banned.

"So this stuff that I potentially had access to that might have been controversial, actually it doesn't exist on cars any more this year."

Previous article Ericsson: Leclerc '19 Ferrari deal good to judge a Sauber extension
Next article Singapore GP dramas disguised Force India's bold new F1 update

Top Comments

Latest news