Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Mercedes explains why it won't challenge Russell's Monaco GP penalties

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Mercedes explains why it won't challenge Russell's Monaco GP penalties

Supercars Darwin: Waters takes first win of 2026 as Ford sweeps top five

Supercars
Darwin Triple Crown
Supercars Darwin: Waters takes first win of 2026 as Ford sweeps top five

You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

Feature
Formula 1
You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica

What to expect – and what not to – from Red Bull's Austria upgrade

Formula 1
Austrian GP
What to expect – and what not to – from Red Bull's Austria upgrade

Mercedes withdraws Russell Monaco GP penalty review request

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Mercedes withdraws Russell Monaco GP penalty review request

Hamilton, Toyota, Marquez: Three motorsport giants still writing history

Feature
Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Hamilton, Toyota, Marquez: Three motorsport giants still writing history

Racing Line spot-on for big rise in Autosport National Rankings

National
Racing Line spot-on for big rise in Autosport National Rankings

Why Gasly's Monaco GP penalty saga risks a regulatory labyrinth with no way out for F1

Formula 1
Why Gasly's Monaco GP penalty saga risks a regulatory labyrinth with no way out for F1
Feature

MPH: Mark Hughes on...

Harking back to a former age

Ross Brawn's takeover of the former Honda team sets up an intriguing scenario. Having an engineer in charge of a team harks back to a former age, a time when Bruce McLaren ran McLaren and Jack Brabham/Ron Tauranac were in charge at Brabham.

It could be great. In one fell swoop many of the limitations of the previous big-budget outfit have dissolved. There is no longer the nightmare of having to coordinate the team base with a parent company over-eager to get involved but without a full understanding of the problems.

The politics of directing a huge budget where it's most needed - rather than where the power base dictates - disappears when there no longer is a huge budget. The energy-sapping issues of what corporate message to send to the world evaporate. All you're left with is a lean, simple racing team. It will be directed by someone with a deep understanding of what makes a car go faster and who isn't much interested in the periphery.

Much of what went wrong at Honda was specific to Honda and shouldn't be seen as inherent in any manufacturer team.

The Renault operation at Enstone works beautifully well in that a budget is provided and the racers are left to do the job. In a different model again, the Toyota operation in Cologne operates very smoothly and since the Tokyo management have become more hands-off the cars have become ever more competitive. But it requires much more energy and resource to keep a giant such as that running smoothly. Brawn GP can be rid of a whole layer of bureaucracy.

Of course for such a team to have a long-term future requires F1's cost cutting measures to be even more savage. In the meantime, Brawn GP inherits facilities built up from a massive manufacturer spend, but without the inertia that a manufacturer programme usually entails. It has some catching up to do in that its rivals have been testing for almost a month, so it would be surprising if it starred in the opening races. But thereafter things could get very interesting.

There's no reason why the woeful performance of the Hondas in the previous two seasons should carry through into Brawn GP. Ross spent last year reorganising the team into a more logical framework with better defined responsibilities. The RA108 was meanwhile patched up and raced as best they could manage. It received scant development into the second half of the season as the focus shifted to the future.

The new car could be very good.

The careers of Jenson Button and Rubens Barrichello have been rescued and for them this is a great opportunity to perform without the pressures of representing a manufacturer.

With the right attitude this could be the basis for giant-killing performances. That attitude is pretty much guaranteed from Rubens, given how keen he was to stay in F1 when it looked like he was going to be forced to call time on his career. For Button it's going to require more of a mind shift. Like the team, he needs to get in lean, hungry mode and see if he can do justice to a wonderful talent just as the sport's power brokers have ceased to have much interest in him.

As well as recalling the past, this leaned-down operation might just be signalling the future. In years to come, will there be a Symonds GP based at Enstone? A Howett F1 in Cologne and maybe even a Sauber team in Hinwil?

Previous article Piquet interview: A second chance
Next article FIA set to postpone new points system

Top Comments

More from Autosport Magazine

Latest news