Stewart hits out at Ford
A fortnight after ending his 40-year association with the Ford Motor Company, Sir Jackie Stewart has criticised the US automotive giant's withdrawal from Formula 1 as "an oversight" that will undermine its long-term commercial position
The 65-year-old admitted to feeling "total shock" at the Blue Oval's decision, announced in September, to pull the plug on both the Jaguar team and Cosworth Racing at the end of the 2004 season.
"One of the great things about Ford is that the company was a global thinker," said Stewart. "I believe not having a presence in Formula 1 will have long-term implications for the company. Even if it is not the case in America, grand prix racing still draws the biggest [global] TV audience."
Stewart's ambassadorial role for Ford dates back to 1964, when as a young driver he was handed a contract to promote the company's products in Britain. Each of his three world championships came in Ford-powered cars, and more recently in the late 1990s he persuaded the Detroit behemoth to fund his own F1 team, Stewart Grand Prix, which it took over in 1999 and rebranded as Jaguar Racing.
The Scot stayed on as a consultant, but the relationship became somewhat strained last summer when it became clear that he was planning to work with the Royal Bank of Scotland, which is expected to announce a sponsorship deal with the Williams team shortly.
Previous article
Red Bull principal Tony Purnell looks to 2005
Next article
David Richards awarded CBE
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum
With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?
OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence
OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1’s elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he’s recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation
How Verstappen is ruining his F1 title battle with Hamilton
OPINION: The Italian GP clash between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen followed a running theme in the 2021 Formula 1 title fight. Their close-quarters battles have often resulted in contact - and although Hamilton has shown a willingness to back off, Verstappen must learn to temper his aggression
Italian Grand Prix Driver Ratings
Two drivers produced maximum-score performances as, for the second year in a row, Monza threw up an unpredictable result that left several others ruing what might have been
Why Ricciardo was set for Monza F1 triumph even without Verstappen/Hamilton crash
The clash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton was the major flashpoint the 2021 Italian Grand Prix will be remembered for. Yet by this point, race leader Daniel Ricciardo had already done the hard work that would put him in position to end his and McLaren's lengthy win droughts, on a memorable afternoon in Monza
