Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

From the archive: When Niki Lauda led an F1 driver strike in 1982

Formula 1
From the archive: When Niki Lauda led an F1 driver strike in 1982

'Antonelli and Sinner, Sinner and Antonelli' - Italy should handle its latest sporting hero with care

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
'Antonelli and Sinner, Sinner and Antonelli' - Italy should handle its latest sporting hero with care

Sky Sports extends F1 live broadcast contract

Formula 1
Miami GP
Sky Sports extends F1 live broadcast contract

The intrigue sparked by Red Bull's Miami sidepod design

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
The intrigue sparked by Red Bull's Miami sidepod design

MotoGP confident it will "reach an agreement" with manufacturers over commercial cycle

MotoGP
Catalan GP
MotoGP confident it will "reach an agreement" with manufacturers over commercial cycle

How over the course of two decades GT3 became modern motorsport’s greatest success

Feature
GT
How over the course of two decades GT3 became modern motorsport’s greatest success

Why time is running out to make bigger F1 power unit changes for 2027

Formula 1
Miami GP
Why time is running out to make bigger F1 power unit changes for 2027

Where will ‘yo-yo’ F1 racing return?

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
Where will ‘yo-yo’ F1 racing return?
Feature

Solutions for Williams and McLaren are on their own doorsteps

In recent years, Williams and McLaren have both developed highly successful off-shoot engineering businesses. But at the same time, the Formula 1 results for both squads have tailed off in a big way. MARK GALLAGHER asks if both teams might benefit if they look closer to home in a bid to fix their current slumps

You know the narrative. They are two of Formula 1's most successful teams - with 17 constructors' and 19 drivers' championships between them - yet neither have won the teams' title this century, and haven't won a race since 2012.

Twenty years ago, McLaren scored their eighth constructors' title, while Williams had just claimed back-to-back crowns in 1996 and '97. But the world has changed since then, old certainties have been washed away and new business models required.

Both have diversified their businesses, McLaren with their Automotive and Applied Technologies divisions, Williams with Advanced Engineering.

But when these teams filled the final four places in qualifying twice last year it only served to magnify a nagging suspicion that eyes were not firmly on the F1 ball.

The dramatic drop in performance has been mirrored by a decline in sponsorship.

McLaren have been without a title sponsor since 2013, while Williams are believed to have sold those rights to AT&T and Martini for relatively modest sums.

Neither team is alone in this battle, however. Claire Ritchie, CEO of sports consultancy Sine Qua Non, says F1 sponsorships have declined by around 25% since 2008, while James Parrish of Rush Sports estimates sponsorship only delivers 25-40% of team revenue.

The decision to diversify is a natural extension of previous projects.

McLaren Cars produced the F1 road car (above) in the 1990s, then collaborated with Mercedes on the SLR. Williams delivered the Metro 6R4 rally car, Renault's British Touring Car Championship programme and BMW's Le Mans project. None of these had truly significant scale, but they did suggest potential. Potential that has now been realised.

McLaren Automotive's success, employing 1,700 staff with a turnover of £526.9m and 3,340 cars sold in 2017, is well known. But MAT and WAE deserve more direct comparison, with sales of £56.4m and £39.5m in '17 respectively. The number of employees are similar, MAT with 377 staff and WAE 300.

Both play to core engineering strengths. MAT are recognised for their exclusive provision of Electronic Control Units to F1, IndyCar and NASCAR, less so for work with Singapore's Mass Rapid Transit System or a project aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes.

WAE enjoyed a strong 2018, typified by the success of Aerofoil - a device which keeps cold air inside supermarket fridges. Half a million units have been fitted, deals with Sainsbury's and Asda just the start.

A joint venture with Unipart to supply electric vehicle batteries complements work with Aston Martin on the Rapide E, while diversity is underlined by the development of fast jet cockpit simulators and lightweight transportable baby incubators.

Both businesses have their own dedicated management teams, but share centralised group services.

WAE's managing director Craig Wilson says both sides of the business collaborate, making best use of people and facilities. Williams team sponsors, such as Unilever, have even migrated to working with WAE. This can also be seen within McLaren, as commercial sponsorships and technology partnerships merge.

Revenue aside, there are benefits in being able to attract and retain talented staff, deliver sustainability and counter the negativity surrounding F1.

The question now arises as to whether the management of the F1 teams can mirror the success of their advanced engineering colleagues, for whom innovation and creativity have been key. Far from being a distraction, could it be that some of the answers to on-track issues lie across the corridors in Woking and Grove?

Previous article Renault: Ricciardo's arrival will help fast-track F1 progress
Next article How one of F1's most popular underdogs clinched a third 'works' deal

Top Comments

More from GP Racing

Latest news