The FIA's decision to not take further action against Sebastian Vettel for his clash with Lewis Hamilton at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix has proved almost as controversial as the incident itself
On one side of the debate are those who think Vettel has got away with his actions simply because of a late apology, and on the other side are those who believed that the German already served his punishment in Baku so F1 is right to forgive, forget and move on.
Regardless of the various opinions floating around, the clash with Hamilton and the fallout over the last week has brought up some big issues that should be addressed.
SHOULD 'SORRY' BE THE EASIEST WORD?
The key thrust of the reasoning for FIA president Jean Todt's decision to draw a line under the matter was that Vettel admitted full responsibility and apologised for what happened.
But should saying sorry - especially when that regret comes only after you are at risk of further sanctions - be enough?
On Sunday night in Baku neither Vettel nor Ferrari showed any remorse for what happened, and even questioned the decision to get a penalty at all.
But precedent would now seem to suggest that saying sorry is enough to escape punishments, with Vettel having also been let off for his outburst against Charlie Whiting at least year's Mexican Grand Prix in light an apology he made after that race.
The FIA could find itself in a tricky situation in the future if drivers view these two Vettel affairs as a green light to behave as they want on track, if they know that simply apologising afterwards is enough to escape a slap over the wrists.
IS IT TIME FOR AN OVERHAUL?
One of the reasons why the FIA may have preferred to avoid taking the matter to its International Tribunal is that it would have opened up a lengthy legal process that would have overshadowed F1 for the next few months.
The processes laid down in FIA statutes state that if a Tribunal hearing is called and charges are brought against a competitor, then there is a 15-day time frame for the accused to respond, another 15-day time frame for the prosecutor to reply, and then a further 15-days before a hearing can begin.
Even after the hearing, there then remains the possibility of the matter going to the International Court of Appeal which could take several more weeks.
In a worst-case scenario, this affair could have dragged on until late summer.
That prompts the question about whether there is a case for the FIA's disciplinary process to change, especially when it comes to incidents like Vettel's Mexican GP outburst and the Baku safety car swipe.
Should there be the creation of some form of panel of experts that could be brought into play to make fast-track judgements on the rare occasions when controversial incidents prompt a post-race investigation?
DOES F1 NEED MORE TRANSPARENCY?
The Vettel incident in Baku has served to divide F1's fanbase, with almost everyone having a strong opinion about who was right and who was wrong.
But the situation has not been helped by the lack of a full explanation behind many of the decisions made from the moment the incident happened.
The full telemetry readings that the FIA based its initial reasoning that Hamilton did not brake test Vettel should have been released to prove that the Mercedes driver was innocent.
And what was the official reasoning for Vettel not getting a black flag in Baku - was it really because he was fighting for the championship, or were there other factors at play?
Too much mystery surrounded Monday's hearing too, with the FIA not willing to release details of who was going to be present at the meeting. Why also only have Vettel and Ferrari present and not Hamilton as the afflicted party?
There has not yet been an explanation of why an apology is enough when the whole reason the investigation was called in the first place was because of fears about the impact the incident could have on motor racing's image and reputation.
It was little wonder then that, in light of such a wall of silence, that a 'fake news' FIA press release (declaring Vettel was excluded from the Baku race) was able to get traction on social media on Monday and even get picked up by some national newspapers as being official.
F1 needs to do more to give all the facts to fans so they can form well-considered opinions.
IS IT TIME FOR F1 TO MOVE ON?
In sporting terms, absolutely. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the FIA's decision and what Vettel did in Azerbaijan, the incident should not be allowed to overshadow what is turning out to be a fantastic F1 campaign.
Let's also not forget that Vettel did not get away scot-free. He was given a 10-second stop-go penalty and had three disciplinary points added on to his superlicence. If he gets three more points at this weekend's Austrian Grand Prix, then it will mean a race ban for Silverstone.
The Baku incident and its fallout has not robbed us of any sporting spectacle in future races - in fact it has added an edge to the campaign that wasn't there before when Vettel and Hamilton were initially locked in some kind of 'bromance' about their mutual respect for each other.
Sport thrives when there is a proper head-to-head and passions are raised, although sporting fairness must always take precedent.
Let's hope lessons about overreacting have really been learned and that Hamilton-Vettel duel becomes one for all of us to behold.
Judging by the huge interest that the Vettel affair has driven, there are going to be plenty of eyeballs on F1 for the next few races, and that is something we can at least all celebrate together.
The technical directive issued by Formula 1 to reduce levels of automation in pitstops has given teams an unwelcome period of adjustment. Although safety was the primary goal, it has already had a significant impact on the title race and puts extra pressure on teams to deliver as the season reaches the business end
Some 18 drivers have finished runner-up to Lewis Hamilton on his way to 100 wins. Three of those recall their battles with Formula 1’s centurion and give their personal insights into the seven-time world champion on his rise to unchartered territory
The 2021 Russian GP was decided by late-arriving rain that allowed some to climb and caused others to plummet. But the events which played out beforehand are equally significant when considering the all-important driver ratings
Until rain turned the Russian Grand Prix on its head in the closing stages, Lando Norris was set to convert his first Formula 1 pole position into a maiden win. But having recovered well from being shuffled back at the start, Hamilton and his Mercedes team called the changing conditions spot-on for a landmark 100th F1 victory
At the Italian Grand Prix Daniel Ricciardo turned around a troubled F1 season and, in F2, Oscar Piastri demonstrated once again that he is a potential star of the future. BEN EDWARDS weighs up the prospects of F1 having two Australian stars
Michael Schumacher is the latest sporting superstar to get the ‘Netflix treatment’, with a special documentary film airing on the US streaming giant’s platform this month. DAMIEN SMITH has the inside track on how the filmmakers gained access to tell the human story behind one of Formula 1’s most publicity-shy champions - while the man himself, for obvious reasons, is in absentia…
For the second race in a row, Mercedes has ended the first day of track action on top. It’s in a commanding position at the Russian Grand Prix once again – this time largely thanks to Max Verstappen’s upcoming engine-change grid penalty. But there’s plenty to suggest all hope is not lost for the championship leader at Sochi