Sebastian Vettel Baku FIA case: Four key questions after the verdict

The FIA's decision to not take further action against Sebastian Vettel for his clash with Lewis Hamilton at the Azerbaijan Grand Prix has proved almost as controversial as the incident itself

Sebastian Vettel Baku FIA case: Four key questions after the verdict

On one side of the debate are those who think Vettel has got away with his actions simply because of a late apology, and on the other side are those who believed that the German already served his punishment in Baku so F1 is right to forgive, forget and move on.

Regardless of the various opinions floating around, the clash with Hamilton and the fallout over the last week has brought up some big issues that should be addressed.

SHOULD 'SORRY' BE THE EASIEST WORD?

The key thrust of the reasoning for FIA president Jean Todt's decision to draw a line under the matter was that Vettel admitted full responsibility and apologised for what happened.

But should saying sorry - especially when that regret comes only after you are at risk of further sanctions - be enough?

On Sunday night in Baku neither Vettel nor Ferrari showed any remorse for what happened, and even questioned the decision to get a penalty at all.

Vettel apologises for 'dangerous overreaction'

But precedent would now seem to suggest that saying sorry is enough to escape punishments, with Vettel having also been let off for his outburst against Charlie Whiting at least year's Mexican Grand Prix in light an apology he made after that race.

The FIA could find itself in a tricky situation in the future if drivers view these two Vettel affairs as a green light to behave as they want on track, if they know that simply apologising afterwards is enough to escape a slap over the wrists.

IS IT TIME FOR AN OVERHAUL?

One of the reasons why the FIA may have preferred to avoid taking the matter to its International Tribunal is that it would have opened up a lengthy legal process that would have overshadowed F1 for the next few months.

The processes laid down in FIA statutes state that if a Tribunal hearing is called and charges are brought against a competitor, then there is a 15-day time frame for the accused to respond, another 15-day time frame for the prosecutor to reply, and then a further 15-days before a hearing can begin.

Even after the hearing, there then remains the possibility of the matter going to the International Court of Appeal which could take several more weeks.

In a worst-case scenario, this affair could have dragged on until late summer.

That prompts the question about whether there is a case for the FIA's disciplinary process to change, especially when it comes to incidents like Vettel's Mexican GP outburst and the Baku safety car swipe.

Should there be the creation of some form of panel of experts that could be brought into play to make fast-track judgements on the rare occasions when controversial incidents prompt a post-race investigation?

DOES F1 NEED MORE TRANSPARENCY?

The Vettel incident in Baku has served to divide F1's fanbase, with almost everyone having a strong opinion about who was right and who was wrong.

But the situation has not been helped by the lack of a full explanation behind many of the decisions made from the moment the incident happened.

The full telemetry readings that the FIA based its initial reasoning that Hamilton did not brake test Vettel should have been released to prove that the Mercedes driver was innocent.

And what was the official reasoning for Vettel not getting a black flag in Baku - was it really because he was fighting for the championship, or were there other factors at play?

Too much mystery surrounded Monday's hearing too, with the FIA not willing to release details of who was going to be present at the meeting. Why also only have Vettel and Ferrari present and not Hamilton as the afflicted party?

There has not yet been an explanation of why an apology is enough when the whole reason the investigation was called in the first place was because of fears about the impact the incident could have on motor racing's image and reputation.

It was little wonder then that, in light of such a wall of silence, that a 'fake news' FIA press release (declaring Vettel was excluded from the Baku race) was able to get traction on social media on Monday and even get picked up by some national newspapers as being official.

F1 needs to do more to give all the facts to fans so they can form well-considered opinions.

IS IT TIME FOR F1 TO MOVE ON?

In sporting terms, absolutely. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the FIA's decision and what Vettel did in Azerbaijan, the incident should not be allowed to overshadow what is turning out to be a fantastic F1 campaign.

Let's also not forget that Vettel did not get away scot-free. He was given a 10-second stop-go penalty and had three disciplinary points added on to his superlicence. If he gets three more points at this weekend's Austrian Grand Prix, then it will mean a race ban for Silverstone.

The Baku incident and its fallout has not robbed us of any sporting spectacle in future races - in fact it has added an edge to the campaign that wasn't there before when Vettel and Hamilton were initially locked in some kind of 'bromance' about their mutual respect for each other.

Sport thrives when there is a proper head-to-head and passions are raised, although sporting fairness must always take precedent.

Let's hope lessons about overreacting have really been learned and that Hamilton-Vettel duel becomes one for all of us to behold.

Judging by the huge interest that the Vettel affair has driven, there are going to be plenty of eyeballs on F1 for the next few races, and that is something we can at least all celebrate together.

shares
comments
Ferrari more aggressive than Mercedes with British GP tyre choices
Previous article

Ferrari more aggressive than Mercedes with British GP tyre choices

Next article

What are Alonso's options for 2018?

What are Alonso's options for 2018?
Load comments
How Ferrari gained a new edge over McLaren in the best-of-the-rest F1 2021 battle Plus

How Ferrari gained a new edge over McLaren in the best-of-the-rest F1 2021 battle

Supremacy in the McLaren vs Ferrari fight over third place in the constructors’ championship has ebbed and flowed between the two teams so far in the 2021 Formula 1 season. But for several key reasons, right now it seems the advantage has swung decisively back to the Scuderia and McLaren knows it.

The 70s US superteam that tried and failed to crack F1 Plus

The 70s US superteam that tried and failed to crack F1

Vel’s Parnelli Jones Racing was briefly one of the biggest names on the US motorsports scene, but its ambition outstripped its resources. STUART CODLING relates the story of a Formula 1 campaign cut off in its prime

Formula 1
Oct 26, 2021
The key details that boosted Red Bull and held back Hamilton in Verstappen’s USA victory Plus

The key details that boosted Red Bull and held back Hamilton in Verstappen’s USA victory

As the 2021 Formula 1 title battle winds towards its climax, the United States GP added another thrilling act in the Lewis Hamilton-Max Verstappen battle. Although Hamilton aced the start, Verstappen and Red Bull took the initiative with strategy and were richly rewarded, despite Mercedes' best efforts as the race went down to the wire

Formula 1
Oct 25, 2021
US Grand Prix Driver Ratings Plus

US Grand Prix Driver Ratings

On a baking hot afternoon at the returning Circuit of the Americas, Formula 1 drivers were tested to their limits. As the pressure on the title contending squads reaches an ever-greater level of intensity, the foremost challengers again showed their class, but were outshone by a standout drive from the upper midfield

Formula 1
Oct 25, 2021
Why F1's misunderstood party animal will thrive in retirement Plus

Why F1's misunderstood party animal will thrive in retirement

Three years on from Kimi Raikkonen's last Grand Prix victory at Austin, he is now six races away from ending the longest Formula 1 career in history. His friend and former Ice1 Racing rally team PR man ANTHONY PEACOCK explains why there’s nobody quite like the 2007 world champion and why F1 will miss him (but he won’t miss it)

Formula 1
Oct 24, 2021
The 10 greatest drives of lost legend Jo Siffert Plus

The 10 greatest drives of lost legend Jo Siffert

It's 50 years since Jo Siffert was killed in his prime at Brands Hatch. The Swiss scored just two world championship wins in a Formula 1 career spent largely with privateer teams, but showed on numerous occasions in single-seaters and in sportscars with Porsche that he could beat any of the best drivers of his era given the right equipment

Formula 1
Oct 24, 2021
Verstappen exclusive: How Red Bull’s ace has become F1 champion material Plus

Verstappen exclusive: How Red Bull’s ace has become F1 champion material

As Red Bull and Honda go all-out for victory in the Japanese engine manufacturer’s last season of its latest Formula 1 dalliance, Max Verstappen finds himself thrust into a compelling title fight with Lewis Hamilton. He told OLEG KARPOV about his evolution into a world championship contender and why Red Bull's no compromise ethos suits him down to the ground

Formula 1
Oct 23, 2021
How Mercedes went from Austin practice domination to "very tight at the front" with Red Bull Plus

How Mercedes went from Austin practice domination to "very tight at the front" with Red Bull

Mercedes has been on a roll of late in the ultra-tight fight to win the 2021 Formula 1 world championship. It started off well in practice at Austin for this weekend’s US Grand Prix, but Red Bull got closer as Friday unfolded and even seemed to find an edge in one critical area of what seems set to be another close contest

Formula 1
Oct 23, 2021