Robert Kubica's absence a bigger blow to Renault in 2011 than exhaust issue, says Eric Boullier
Renault team boss Eric Boullier believes the absence of Robert Kubica was a bigger factor in the squad's poor 2011 season than the unsuccessful forward-facing exhaust layout
After a promising start to the year, with two podiums in the opening two grands prix, Renault's season tailed off dramatically and by the end of 2011 it was often struggling to even get into the points, leaving its technical chiefs to admit that the radical exhaust arrangement had hampered the car.
But Boullier says the loss of erstwhile lead driver Kubica's services after the Pole was seriously injured in a pre-season rally crash was the main cause of Renault's slump.
Asked by AUTOSPORT what he felt was the primary reason why 2011 proved so tough for Renault, Boullier replied: "Robert, by far. By far because there was a direct sporting loss, which obviously was related to the speed, and was also a morale blow for the team and for everybody.
"But you had an indirect loss too - and this is one of the bigger values of Robert. It's mental strength, and also the commitment from the team to make it good and better. And this... we don't know how much it cost us, because maybe part of the development of the forward exhausts could have been done differently with the comments of Robert."
Kubica will definitely miss the start of the 2012 season as well, and looks increasingly unlikely to drive for Renault - which will soon become Lotus - when he returns. The team has now signed Kimi Raikkonen and Romain Grosjean for next year.
Despite 2011 proving so frustrating for Renault, Boullier believes the experience will have made the team stronger for the future.
"This year has been very tough for our people, for me and for everybody in the company because it was very frustrating," he said. "But maybe we will go deeper into understanding how we can be better.
"If the car had developed very well with Robert, then maybe we could have been chasing for the top three in the championship and we'd think, 'Wow, we are in good shape.' But, in fact, we would have missed a lot of things.
"For me with this experience, it maybe looks like a disaster but it was great to be learning."
Be part of the Autosport community
Join the conversationShare Or Save This Story
Top Comments
“Nothing is working” on Red Bull F1 car as Verstappen faces fresh struggles
Ferrari: McLaren rear wing legality was ‘black and white’ matter
Jon Noble: Why Newey’s myth-busting correction is bad news for Aston Martin’s rivals
Austin WEC win redemption for Le Mans heartbreak, say Ferrari crew
WEC COTA: AF Corse Ferrari sneaks past Toyota for win
How Kubica found the answer to his own incredible F1 challenge
What could have been: When Villeneuve’s shock return thwarted an F1 rookie
Friday favourite: Renault's original F1 title-winner that began the Alonso era
Why Renault's survivor wasn't part of Alpine's plans
What we learned from Friday practice at the 2024 Singapore Grand Prix
Rossi to drive BMW LMDh car in Bahrain WEC rookie test
Morbidelli lost memory for two weeks after pre-season MotoGP crash
Why Marquez thinks double Misano win will be a long shot despite gaps shrinking
The statistical F1 anomaly Verstappen will seek to remedy in Singapore
The hard-to-shift narratives Mercedes needs Antonelli's next steps to dispel
Why Perez is so good in Baku and could still save his 2025 seat
Piastri's brilliance is both saving and causing problems for McLaren
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
