Pirelli: Raikkonen's British GP puncture caused by external damage
Pirelli has concluded that Kimi Raikkonen's tyre problem at the British Grand Prix was caused by external damage rather than any structural or wear issues
Following a detail examination of the front left tyre that came apart two laps before the end of the Silverstone race, Pirelli is confident that fatigue or design problems were not to blame.
Instead its examination suggests that two impacts on the tyre's belt area triggered the problem that forced Raikkonen to pit late on.
"This damage is not present throughout any other areas of the tyre whatsoever," read a Pirelli statement issued on Wednesday night.
"Furthermore, the belt and the structure do not show any signs of fatigue.
"The possible initial cause of this damage is consistent with contact against an external body, leading to a partial separation of the belt from the carcass in the two affected areas.
"In one of these two places, as a logical consequence, part of the tread also became detached."
Pirelli explained that it conducted tests on other tyres used at the Silverstone race to see if there were hints that other drives were encountering similar problems.
But its analysis showed that all other tyres were structurally sound.
"On no occasion was there any sign of fatigue, detachment or laceration - or even the beginning of such problems - that affected the structure of the tyre," the statement added.
"In conclusion, Pirelli can confirm that no issues have emerged connected with the tyre itself."
Raikkonen's team-mate Sebastian Vettel also suffered a tyre failure on the penultimate lap, which Pirelli explained was triggered by a slow puncture.
Due to the damage caused to the tyre as Vettel returned to the pits, Pirelli was unable to uncover what led to the puncture.
Previous article
Ferrari F1 junior Leclerc learning from Vettel/Raikkonen feedback
Next article
Renault rules out Kubica replacing Palmer during 2017 F1 season
The floundering fortunes of F1’s many Lotus reboots
Team Lotus ceased to exist in 1994 - and yet various parties have been trying to resurrect the hallowed name, in increasingly unrecognisable forms, ever since. DAMIEN SMITH brings GP Racing’s history of the legendary team to an end with a look at those who sought to keep the flame alive in Formula 1
Why the 2021 title fight is far from F1's worst, despite its toxic background
OPINION: Formula 1 reconvenes for the Russian Grand Prix two weeks after the latest blow in ‘Max Verstappen vs Lewis Hamilton’. While the Silverstone and Monza incidents were controversial, they thankfully lacked one element that so far separates the 2021 title fight from the worst examples of ugly championship battles
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum
With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?
OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects
