Patrick Head Q&A
Following a series of engine failures in Silverstone testing, Williams and BMW were a little concerned about the team's new traction control system, and after Friday morning practice in Barcelona it was decided to revert to standard trim. When electronic gizmos were banned at the end of 1993, Williams were the masters of the game, which makes the current problems doubly frustrating for technical guru Patrick Head. It was this disrupted programme rather than any lack of performance from Michelin that meant that Ralf Schumacher was not able to repeat his Imola form. Retirements ahead meant that Juan Pablo Montoya was at least able to salvage a very valuable six points, but a closer study of lap times reveals that had Ralf stayed on the road, he might have been in a position to catch his struggling brother. Although passing would have been another matter... Adam Cooper spoke to Head
"We used the traction control just at the start, and from then on it was switched off. It's not a question of problems - basically in its current form it gives the engine quite a hard time, and some of the other hardware. Whereas two weeks ago there was confidence that there wouldn't be a problem, at the Silverstone test last week we had a couple of problems and then we had to debate what was the best position. We probably could have been more competitive had we used it, but we just felt that we had a higher confidence of finishing."
"It's one of those things. Up to the point that suddenly the problem arose, there was every confidence that it was OK. And even then I don't think BMW were absolutely certain that the problems that occurred at Silverstone were due to the traction control, but when you're uncertain in this business, and you haven't got enough data, sometimes you have to go for the conservative option."
"The actual request for the traction control and how much it is is a Williams matter, because that's to do with the chassis. We give a request to BMW to cut the power of the engine by a certain amount. BMW then have to do it, subject to whatever problems that causes the engine, so they have to deal with that side of it."
"We would have been quicker with it, but we decided it would be better here not to do so. It was fundamentally a BMW decision that it would be better not to do so.
"No I wouldn't say so. I think we didn't really have the car very well set-up. We managed to get it reasonably well set-up by qualifying, but we just lost momentum and lost time by not being very well set earlier."
"Certainly if you're in the wet at Monaco! Austria will be one as well, particularly if it's wet."
"I think the brake balance just initiated a slide at the rear, and off he went."
Share Or Save This Story
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments