Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Formula 1
Miami GP
FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Formula 1
Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Formula 1
Miami GP
Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

General
Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Feature
BTCC
Donington Park (National Circuit)
Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

General
Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

Why 'inevitably' struck again in IndyCar as Palou won at Long Beach

Feature
IndyCar
Long Beach
Why 'inevitably' struck again in IndyCar as Palou won at Long Beach

Tech3 forced into fielding just one bike for MotoGP Spanish GP

MotoGP
Spanish GP
Tech3 forced into fielding just one bike for MotoGP Spanish GP

New Concorde Agreement row brews

Formula 1's hopes of political stability as it braces itself to stave off the threat of a breakaway championship run by the sport's engine-manufacturers may have been dashed, according to this week's Autosport magazine

A fresh row is brewing over European competition law, just weeks after the European Union's Competitions' Commission appeared to have given the sport a clean bill of health after requesting and receiving guarantees on such matters as commercial and TV rights. This time, the seeds of the row appear to have come from within the ranks of the teams themselves.

In order to comply with EU requests, the sport's governing body, the FIA, made changes to the Concorde Agreement, the document by which F1 is run. The changes, made in July 2000, were introduced to satisfy the EU that the sport was not being run as a non-competitive monopoly.

But senior sources in the F1 paddock say that the McLaren and Williams teams have written to the EU saying the changes by the FIA were made unilaterally and without the consent of the teams, making them invalid.

Any changes to the Concorde Agreement can only be made with the full agreement of all the teams and the FIA. The letter to the EU is believed to have been supported by up to four other teams.

It is believed that the letter to the EU may be an attempt by the teams to put pressure on the FIA to come up with a new Concorde Agreement, which covers such aspects of the sport as the distribution of TV revenues and race purses. The teams are pushing for what they see as a fairer distribution of monies.

Speaking in Hockenheim last weekend, Arrows boss Tom Walkinshaw said: "If there is a new agreement thrashed out, it will benefit everyone. It would be in the best interests of everyone in the sport if we cvould have stability and clarity and I don't think it is healthy to have parts of the sport saying they are going to do other things."

The five European manufacturers currently involved in F1 - Ford (Jaguar), Renault, BMW, Fiat (Ferrari) and Mercedes-Benz - have announced plans to set up their own championship at the end of the current period of the Concorde Agreement, which runs until the end of 2007.

The so-called 'Big Five' want a greater say in the running and direction of the sport and in its commercial exploitation, but a revised Concorde Agreement could prove crucial in keeping them in F1.

Previous article Yoong closes in on Minardi race seat
Next article Exclusive: British GP faces new threat

Top Comments