Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

National
History repeats as 70th anniversary of Mallory Park is celebrated

How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Feature
BTCC
Snetterton (300 Circuit)
How Sutton's BTCC steamroller overcame Snetterton challenges

Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Rossi faces key decision: Who will replace di Giannantonio at VR46?

Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Red Bull reacts to Verstappen’s criticism – why ‘I told you’ moments are needed

Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

National
Mini miracles as remarkable podium stories play out at Snetterton

Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why Russell doesn’t want to see the 2026 F1 rules changed

How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Feature
IndyCar
110th Running of the Indianapolis 500
How Rosenqvist came of age in the closest Indy 500 finish in history

Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Why "awesome" Canadian GP has convinced Hamilton he's "probably better without" Ferrari simulator

Manufacturers hit back at Mosley

Two of Formula 1's biggest engine manufacturers have hit back at accusations from FIA president Max Mosley that they are wrong in claiming that a future switch to 2.4-litre V8 engines will end up costing more money than sticking with V10s

As the row over the future direction of engine regulations shows no signs of abating, Mercedes-Benz and BMW have hit back at the FIA and defended their belief that a massive change of regulations will not only be more expensive but will not slow the cars down much.

Mercedes-Benz motorsport boss Norberg Haug said: "We are not liars. We are not here to threaten or to provoke aggravation. But you have to ask youself if a company such as Mercedes is not better equipped to compare costs of the different engine concepts.

"And with all due respect it must be allowed to give an opinion. Even if that opinion was the most idiotic thing ever to be said, it should still be allowed to be told."

Speaking about comments from Mosley that the manufacturers had been misleading regarding the new proposals, BMW Motorsport Director Mario Theissen said: "I find them inappropriate. Such comments for sure do not help our situation. We are all trying our best to find a reasonable compromise between all parties involved."

Both engine manufacturers agree that with new aerodynamic and tyre regulations being introduced next year then there is little need to also cut back on engine power.

Haug said: "Most of the technicians think that the other measures to demobilise Formula 1 are enough to slow the cars down. The new aero package alone costs some two seconds. And then there is the reduction in tyre sets.

"The increase in speed or the faster lap times are not due to the engine alone. Just have a look at a traditional engine track such as Monza. There, the lap times are not as much lower than in Budapest, for instance. That for me is proof enough that the dropping in lap times is mainly due to tyres and aerodynamics, not to the engine."

Previous article BMW questions Ralf's decision
Next article Grapevine: Renault and Oxfam Join Forces for Charity

Top Comments