Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Why so many F1 drivers were penalised for pitlane speeding in Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Why so many F1 drivers were penalised for pitlane speeding in Monaco GP

Gasly felt "robbed" of F1 Monaco GP podium as Alpine requests right of review over pitlane speeding

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Gasly felt "robbed" of F1 Monaco GP podium as Alpine requests right of review over pitlane speeding

Lotus will not appeal stewards' decision on Mercedes rear wing

Lotus has elected not to appeal against the FIA stewards' decision that the Mercedes DRS system is legal, after its protest about the design was rejected on Thursday night

Following a lengthy meeting in the Shanghai paddock between the FIA and representatives of the Lotus and Mercedes teams, the four race stewards at the Chinese Grand Prix threw out the protest that had been lodged earlier in the day.

Although Lotus was reminded of its right to appeal the decision, sources at the team have confirmed to AUTOSPORT that it will not challenge the ruling - which means that the team must now decide if it is worth devoting resources to create its own version of the double DRS.

In a lengthy report issued afterwards by the stewards explaining their decision, they said that they had reached their verdict on several grounds.

They believe that the 'double DRS' system was within the regulations because it was completely passive - and was not influenced by driver movement but "indirectly (and not directly) consequential to the movement of the driver adjustable bodywork."

Mercedes had also successfully argued that many rival teams had modified bodywork on their cars to enhance the effects of DRS - and that its concept of flowing air through the endplate and down the car to stall the front wing was just another example of this.

The stewards also made it clear that the fact that Mercedes had sought clarification about the design from the FIA before the start of the season was important.

The statement said: "Further, and distinct from the grounds above, the protest is dismissed on the grounds that the FIA confirmed the assertion of the Mercedes team that it had, in accordance with Article 2.4 and/or 2.5 of the F1 Technical Regulations, sought clarification from the FIA Formula One Technical Department concerning this matter and the FIA confirmed that the Mercedes design had been deemed permissible."

Previous article The full Mercedes decision by the FIA
Next article Human Rights Watch warns Formula 1 over Bahrain Grand Prix

Top Comments

Latest news