Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Monaco Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Monaco Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

What could drive McLaren to build its own F1 engine

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
What could drive McLaren to build its own F1 engine

Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Force India's long-running legal dispute with Aerolab settled

Force India's long-running legal dispute with Aerolab, Mike Gascoyne and the Caterham F1 team has been settled at the High Court of Justice in London today

Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the team had "come nowhere near" establishing that Aerolab had systematically copied significant parts of Force India's design when designing the Team Lotus T127.

Aerolab had previously partnered with Vijay Mallya's squad until late July 2009, when it decided to terminate the contract due to unpaid fees. Caterham, called Lotus Racing at the time the dispute occurred, came on board several days later.

A 14-day hearing was held in the Chancery Division of the London High Court, with a number of experts including Frank Dernie, ex-Ligier technical director who has acted as a consultant for both Williams and Toyota in Formula 1.

On the evidence provided, Mr Justice Arnold settled in Aerolab's favour the dispute over unpaid fees to the sum of €850,000.

He awarded Force India €25,000 in compensation in regard to use of its intellectual property rights, which was deemed to have been done as a short cut.

"Such misuse as I have found to have occurred mainly consisted of opportunistic copying of CAD files by CAD designers in order to take a short cut," Mr Justice Arnold added.

Jean-Claude Migeot, Aerolab's managing director, said in a statement he was relieved a verdict had been reached.

"It has taken a long time but I am extremely happy and relieved to see 1Malaysia Racing Team [Caterham F1, then Team Lotus] and Mike Gascoyne cleared of any wrongdoing," he said.

"I have always felt that the case was only initiated by Force India as a means to delay payment for outstanding work. With the Court having now examined the often extremely technical aspects of the evidence and come to the decision it has, my viewpoint has not altered.

"After two years of legal dispute, I am looking forward to once again focusing all of my attention on current and future Aerolab/FondTech projects."

A separate hearing will be held to determine the covering of legal costs associated with the trial.

Previous article Button admits he was not expecting McLaren to be so strong in Australia
Next article Aerolab vindicated by Force India ruling

Top Comments