Force India's F1 number saga sets 'huge precedent' over legality
Force India technical director Andy Green fears the controversy over the team's numbers at the Spanish Grand Prix sets a "huge" precedent regarding Formula 1 car legality
The team was handed a €25,000 suspended fine following the Barcelona race when the FIA deemed its numbers did not comply with new demands laid down to enhance visibility.
It elected not to appeal that decision and made subsequent modifications for the Monaco Grand Prix, but Green believes the saga has set a bad precedent for cars being declared illegal despite passing scrutineering.
"I was livid," he said. "Absolutely livid.
"Because that set a precedent that should never happen. There is no way a car can go through scrutineering several times.
"We are not just talking about Barcelona, we are talking about the fifth time it had been through scrutineering with exactly the same position [of the number], and [there had been] not one bit of feedback from the FIA up until that point.
"Also, when we did revise the size of the numbering for that event, it was shown to the FIA prior to that event what we were going to do.
"So to then go through all those procedures and at the end of it say you are not right and slap us on the wrist for it, it is just...[shakes head]"
"How do we know we are legal now? I've got no idea. We've gone through scrutineering but to me now scrutineering means nothing.
"The precedent that it has set is huge. Absolutely huge."
Force India's chief operating officer Otmar Szafnauer said it was likely the team would bring up the matter in a future Strategy Group meeting.
"For sure we can stick that up at the next meeting," he said.
"But what we have tried to focus on doing was getting the number to be like they like it and we have achieved that.
"The bigger question is, can this happen for something else?"
Asked why, if the team was so unhappy with what happened, it chose not to appeal, Szafnauer said: "We could have done.
"But the other thing to consider here is it was just a number. If it was something else then maybe you are right.
"We looked at it and said the easiest thing to do is change the number and just get on.
"And the nice thing is it was a suspended sentence, so if we did it we would have nothing. If it was a 25,000 Euro fine then we would have appealed."
Previous article
McLaren not charging Indy 500 sponsors to offset lost F1 exposure
Next article
Podcast: Mario Andretti reflects on his F1 and Indy 500 career
How F1’s other champion to emerge from 1991 thrived at Lotus
Mika Hakkinen became Michael Schumacher’s biggest rival in Formula 1 in the late-90s and early 2000s, having also made his F1 debut in 1991. But as MARK GALLAGHER recalls, while Schumacher wowed the world with a car that was eminently capable, Hakkinen was fighting to make his mark with a famous team in terminal decline
The forgotten F1 comeback that began Jordan’s odyssey
Before Michael Schumacher – or anyone else – had driven the 191 (or 911 as it was initially called), Eddie Jordan turned to a fellow Irishman to test his new Formula 1 car. JOHN WATSON, a grand prix winner for Penske and McLaren, recalls his role in the birth of a legend…
The squandered potential of a 70s F1 underdog
A podium finisher in its first outing but then never again, the BRM P201 was a classic case of an opportunity squandered by disorganisation and complacency, says STUART CODLING
The other notable Monza escape that F1 should learn from
OPINION: The headlines were dominated by the Italian Grand Prix crash between Max Verstappen and Lewis Hamilton, who had the halo to thank for avoiding potentially serious injury. But two days earlier, Formula 1 had a lucky escape with a Monza pitlane incident that could also have had grave consequences
How Monza only added more questions to F1's sprint race conundrum
With two sprint races under its belt, Formula 1 must now consider its options for them going forward. While they've helped deliver exciting racing on Sundays, the sprints themselves have been somewhat lacking - creating yet another conundrum for F1 to solve...
Who should Alfa Romeo sign for 2022's F1 season?
OPINION: With Valtteri Bottas already signed up for 2022, all eyes are on the race for the second seat at Alfa Romeo next year. Antonio Giovinazzi is the current incumbent, but faces a tough competition from appealing short and long-term prospects
The "forced break" that was key to Ricciardo's Monza excellence
OPINION: Daniel Ricciardo has long been considered one of Formula 1’s elite drivers. But his struggles at McLaren since switching from Renault for 2021 have been painful to watch at times. Yet he’s recovered to banish those memories with a famous Monza win – built on a critically important foundation
How Verstappen is ruining his F1 title battle with Hamilton
OPINION: The Italian GP clash between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen followed a running theme in the 2021 Formula 1 title fight. Their close-quarters battles have often resulted in contact - and although Hamilton has shown a willingness to back off, Verstappen must learn to temper his aggression
