Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The story behind Verstappen’s unique Nürburgring Mercedes setup

NLS
The story behind Verstappen’s unique Nürburgring Mercedes setup

How Williams aims to reach "a sensible position" in F1 2026 after double-score Miami

Feature
Formula 1
How Williams aims to reach "a sensible position" in F1 2026 after double-score Miami

Why Verstappen's preparations have left GT rivals in awe

Endurance
Why Verstappen's preparations have left GT rivals in awe

Nurburgring 24 Hours: Verstappen to start debut from fourth, Lamborghini takes 1-2 in qualifying

Feature
NLS
Nurburgring 24 Hours: Verstappen to start debut from fourth, Lamborghini takes 1-2 in qualifying

Former FIA aero chief officially joins Alpine in senior F1 role

Formula 1
Former FIA aero chief officially joins Alpine in senior F1 role

Remembering a lost Italian F1 hero 40 years on

Feature
Formula 1
Remembering a lost Italian F1 hero 40 years on

Pramac Yamaha set to sign Guevara for the 2027 MotoGP season

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Pramac Yamaha set to sign Guevara for the 2027 MotoGP season

Nurburgring 24 Hours: Verstappen qualifies for pole shootout with sixth in TQ2

Feature
NLS
Nurburgring 24 Hours: Verstappen qualifies for pole shootout with sixth in TQ2

Di Montezemolo critical of KERS

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo has criticised the introduction of Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems (KERS) in Formula One next year - claiming they are too expensive and questioning whether they will have any value for improving road car technology

Formula One teams will be allowed to run KERS from the start of next season in a move that will improve F1's green credentials and fast-track car manufacturers' knowledge of energy recovery systems.

But di Montezemolo has spoken out against the move - saying he believes it is wrong to introduce KERS because the costs of developing the technology are so high.

"The future looks very complicated with these new regulations," he was quoted as saying by Autosprint. "We feel introducing KERS already this year was a mistake, even though we're in favour of F1 being a technological springboard. But the energy recovery system in the races will in any case be very different from the road system.

"It's true, however, that the costs are prohibitive, and with FOTA we've studied important proposals in order to meet Max Mosley's fair requests regarding spending cuts.

"The engine for three GPs for ten million euros means the cost is halved compared to 2008. In 2011 we'll get to five millions, compared to 20 millions from four years before then. On top of that, there is the reduction of testing to 15,000 kms.

"I think we need to rely on good sense: the general one, and the FIA world council's one. Our proposals approved for 2009 set an example. We have two objectives: to help the smaller teams, and to allow F1 to still do research and innovation, also for fuel suppliers.

"It's unthinkable that the big car manufacturers can accept to re-badge the engines built by someone else."

Previous article Toro Rosso to test trio at Barcelona
Next article Webber: Vettel puts pressure on RBR

Top Comments