Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why gloves are now off between Ferrari and Mercedes amid Vasseur anger

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Why gloves are now off between Ferrari and Mercedes amid Vasseur anger

"They scared me yesterday" – Hamilton expected Ferrari to be six tenths off at Silverstone

Formula 1
British GP
"They scared me yesterday" – Hamilton expected Ferrari to be six tenths off at Silverstone

F1 British GP: Hamilton pips Antonelli to Silverstone sprint pole

Formula 1
British GP
F1 British GP: Hamilton pips Antonelli to Silverstone sprint pole

Why McLaren is the only Mercedes team without the latest power unit at Silverstone

Formula 1
British GP
Why McLaren is the only Mercedes team without the latest power unit at Silverstone

Vasseur bites back against Wolff’s Ferrari F1 upgrade "cheating" claims

Formula 1
British GP
Vasseur bites back against Wolff’s Ferrari F1 upgrade "cheating" claims

What's behind Hamilton's Lego British GP drivers' parade concerns

Formula 1
British GP
What's behind Hamilton's Lego British GP drivers' parade concerns

F1 British GP: Hamilton beats Antonelli to top Silverstone practice

Formula 1
British GP
F1 British GP: Hamilton beats Antonelli to top Silverstone practice

LIVE: F1 British GP commentary and updates - Hamilton pips Antonelli to Silverstone sprint pole

Formula 1
British GP
LIVE: F1 British GP commentary and updates - Hamilton pips Antonelli to Silverstone sprint pole

Court rules against Ecclestone

A High Court judge has ruled against F1's commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone in a legal dispute with three German banks. The decision could see a shift in the power that Ecclestone holds over the sport.

The three banks, Bayerische Landesbank, JP Morgan and Lehman Brothers - known as Speed Investments - control 75 per cent of SLEC, the holding company that owns the commercial rights to F1. Ecclestone owns the remaining 25 per cent in a family trust.

Speed took action against Ecclestone following the appointment of two directors to the board of Formula One Holdings, which is owned by SLEC, two years ago. The banks argue that they own 75 per cent of the shares but they do not have any control because the board is made up of people appointed by Ecclestone.

At the start of a judgment, which lasted several hours, Justice Andrew Park said: "In my judgment it is clear that Speed's contentions are correct and I should therefore make the declarations which it requests."

Ecclestone admitted he was not bothered by the ruling and claimed the banks were merely trying to add value to their shares.

When asked what the court ruling meant for him, Ecclestone told Reuters: "Nothing at all. The banks, they want to get out. These people didn't get their shares out of choice, they got them as a security. They got the house and they don't want the house."

The three banks inherited their shares in F1 after the collapse of German media giant Kirch in 2002. As creditors, Bayerische Landesbank, JP Morgan and Lehman Brothers were given Kirch's assets, which included the F1 stake.

"Now they want to cash in the house and that's what they're trying to do," Ecclestone added.
"We have no problems with the banks. This is just a problem of them trying to put value on their shares."

At stake is Ecclestone's hold over an empire that he has been building for the past 20 years. If the banks were to do a deal with the GPWC, the group of car manufacturers threatening to break away from F1, Ecclestone's power could decrease significantly.

Previous article Ecclestone: Court Ruling Means Nothing
Next article Williams: There Won't be a British GP

Top Comments