Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The big British GP chance F1 almost missed

Feature
Formula 1
The big British GP chance F1 almost missed

What Alonso needs from Aston Martin and F1 as career decision looms

Formula 1
Belgian GP
What Alonso needs from Aston Martin and F1 as career decision looms

Why nationality should be 'no factor' as Haas considers Fornaroli and Camara for F1 2027

Feature
Formula 1
Hungarian GP
Why nationality should be 'no factor' as Haas considers Fornaroli and Camara for F1 2027

F1 drivers raise concerns over 'self-learning' power units – what's going on?

Formula 1
Belgian GP
F1 drivers raise concerns over 'self-learning' power units – what's going on?

What is holding back Bagnaia in MotoGP 2026?

MotoGP
What is holding back Bagnaia in MotoGP 2026?

Why the 2026 F1 cars suit Antonelli's driving style more than Russell

Formula 1
Why the 2026 F1 cars suit Antonelli's driving style more than Russell

Hamilton takes "full responsibility" for disappointing Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Hamilton takes "full responsibility" for disappointing Belgian GP

McLaren to finally trial 'Macarena-style' rear wing in Hungarian GP practice

Formula 1
Belgian GP
McLaren to finally trial 'Macarena-style' rear wing in Hungarian GP practice

Canadian Organisers: GP Tickets will Cost More

Organisers of the Canadian Grand Prix said ticket prices to the 2004 event will have to rise, after announcing a new C$29 million (US$22.3 million) package to compensate teams hit by a law banning tobacco advertising.

Organisers of the Canadian Grand Prix said ticket prices to the 2004 event will have to rise, after announcing a new C$29 million (US$22.3 million) package to compensate teams hit by a law banning tobacco advertising.

The Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal was initially scratched from next year's calendar but was provisionally reinstated in October, subject to a satisfactory financial agreement with the teams for running without tobacco sponsorships.

"We have reached a deal with Formula One Management and Bernie Ecclestone, representing the teams, and the Canadian Grand Prix will be on the calendar in 2004 and beyond (until 2006)," race promoter Normand Legault told a news conference.

Legault said the package, a "discount" compared with the C$42 million he said was requested by Ecclestone, would "buy out" the contractual clause allowing the F1 boss to withdraw if cars were unable to run with their cigarette logos.

The race promoter added the deal called for Ecclestone to pitch in, but did not say by how much.

In a statement, Ecclestone said: "All of the Formula One community is pleased to be able to return to Montreal in June and to run there in 2004. We eagerly await this event, which is among the most treasured in the championship".

Compensation Plan

Three of the top four teams, Ferrari, McLaren and Renault, are heavily dependent on tobacco sponsorship. British American Racing is part-owned by British American Tobacco while Jordan is also backed by a cigarette brand.

Canadian organisers, who had said they could not pull off the compensation plan by themselves, will get C$6 million from both the federal and Quebec governments.

Labatt Breweries will put in C$5 million, leaving a C$12 million gap to be filled by Legault, who will try to raise the money through new and existing sponsors.

Though encouraging for the local tourist industry, the Grand Prix generates an estimated C$80 million for the city, the news was a mixed blessing for fans as Legault said ticket prices would have to rise.

The cash-settlement approach by Canada differs from how Belgian organisers and politicians dealt with their tobacco ban.

Belgium postponed its legislation to ensure the race at Spa-Francorchamps returned next year after being dropped from the 2003 calendar.

Tobacco sponsorship is also due to be prohibited in the European Union from mid-2005.

Previous article Webber Pledges Future to Jaguar
Next article Ask Nigel Roebuck: November 19

Top Comments