Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How Ogier’s scary crash opened up Finnish WRC history for Pajari

Feature
WRC
Rally Finland
How Ogier’s scary crash opened up Finnish WRC history for Pajari

What role does a MotoGP rider really play in bike development?

MotoGP
What role does a MotoGP rider really play in bike development?

Why Lindblad hasn’t felt the pressure in F1

Feature
Formula 1
Why Lindblad hasn’t felt the pressure in F1

Fairclough finally flies in GB3 at Silverstone as Bedrin maintains his advantage

National
Fairclough finally flies in GB3 at Silverstone as Bedrin maintains his advantage

Ogier commits to contest all remaining WRC rounds in bid for 10th title

WRC
Rally Finland
Ogier commits to contest all remaining WRC rounds in bid for 10th title

Every circuit to have hosted a WEC round since 2012

WEC
Every circuit to have hosted a WEC round since 2012

Early BMW Super Tourer and Polley Toyota recreation among Touring Car Rewind highlights

National
Early BMW Super Tourer and Polley Toyota recreation among Touring Car Rewind highlights

How WRC drivers reacted to FIA’s landmark promoter deal

WRC
Rally Finland
How WRC drivers reacted to FIA’s landmark promoter deal

Binotto: Racing Point F1 brake duct case "like copying a test"

Mattia Binotto has compared Racing Point's role in the Formula 1 brake duct controversy to "copying a test" amid Ferrari's plans to appeal for a harsher sanction

Racing Point was handed a 15-point constructors' championship penalty and a €400,000 fine after its brake ducts were ruled to have been designed via an illegal process.

Racing Point called the ruling "a bit bewildering", and has confirmed its intention to appeal the sanction and clear its name.

But with the team permitted to continue to use the rear brake ducts for the rest of the season, many of Racing Point's rivals have voiced anger over the leniency of the penalty.

Ferrari, Williams, Renault and McLaren are all planning formal appeals against the ruling, which would result in the case going to the FIA International Court of Appeal.

It sparked an angry response from Racing Point team owner Lawrence Stroll in a rare public statement, while Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff has voiced his opinion that Racing Point is innocent.

Ferrari team principal Binotto called the ruling from the FIA stewards a "starting point" in the case, and that the breach in the regulations was obvious.

"As Ferrari we have already talked about the Racing Point case on Friday, we have already said what we think," Binotto said on Sky Sports Italia.

"There have been protests, and there was the first verdict that said that what Racing Point did is illegal. This is a starting point.

"Stroll and Wolff may be furious, but there has been a violation of the regulations here.

"This is like copying a test. There are those who copy the test, and those who pass the test to have others copy it.

"I don't think there's anything to add to that. The facts are obvious. We are opponents and this is normal. Everyone looks at their own interest.

"We have laid down our intention to appeal. We believe that the sentence was not adequate, and we have four days to confirm it."

Mercedes has come into the spotlight in the case due to a transfer of parts that took place on 6 January - after the brake ducts had stopped being a non-listed part.

The stewards' ruling did not suggest Mercedes had wrongly passed any data concerning the brake ducts to Racing Point, with the 6 January transfer not expanding on the information that had previously been legitimately passed under the regulations.

Wolff said on Sunday that Mercedes had done nothing wrong in the case.

"We have done nothing wrong. I strongly believe that Racing Point has done nothing wrong," Wolff said.

"I believe that if this goes to the International Court of Appeal, the lawyers and the barristers have a strong opinion that this is a case that has very, very solid pillars, and therefore everybody's in a good place about that.

"If someone thinks that we have done something wrong, they should protest, and we're happy to go to court."

Previous article Williams explains position in Racing Point F1 case appeal
Next article How F1's COVID goodwill broke apart on its birthday weekend

Top Comments

Latest news