Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Trackhouse Aprilia set to finalise Raul Fernandez 2027 MotoGP deal

MotoGP
Czech GP
Trackhouse Aprilia set to finalise Raul Fernandez 2027 MotoGP deal

Acosta points out the major flaw in MotoGP's plan to ban front holeshot device mid-season

MotoGP
Czech GP
Acosta points out the major flaw in MotoGP's plan to ban front holeshot device mid-season

The bold Ferrari turnaround that enabled Hamilton's Barcelona win

Feature
Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
The bold Ferrari turnaround that enabled Hamilton's Barcelona win

Vital step made towards USA's WRC return

WRC
Vital step made towards USA's WRC return

How British GT is on for an enthralling 2026 title fight

Feature
British GT
How British GT is on for an enthralling 2026 title fight

Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Mercedes reveals conclusions after costly DNFs in recent F1 races

Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Ferrari to introduce new F1 fuel and engine updates in Austria

MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

MotoGP
Czech GP
MotoGP’s own ‘Concorde Agreement’ is finally official

Binotto: Racing Point F1 brake duct case "like copying a test"

Mattia Binotto has compared Racing Point's role in the Formula 1 brake duct controversy to "copying a test" amid Ferrari's plans to appeal for a harsher sanction

Racing Point was handed a 15-point constructors' championship penalty and a €400,000 fine after its brake ducts were ruled to have been designed via an illegal process.

Racing Point called the ruling "a bit bewildering", and has confirmed its intention to appeal the sanction and clear its name.

But with the team permitted to continue to use the rear brake ducts for the rest of the season, many of Racing Point's rivals have voiced anger over the leniency of the penalty.

Ferrari, Williams, Renault and McLaren are all planning formal appeals against the ruling, which would result in the case going to the FIA International Court of Appeal.

It sparked an angry response from Racing Point team owner Lawrence Stroll in a rare public statement, while Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff has voiced his opinion that Racing Point is innocent.

Ferrari team principal Binotto called the ruling from the FIA stewards a "starting point" in the case, and that the breach in the regulations was obvious.

"As Ferrari we have already talked about the Racing Point case on Friday, we have already said what we think," Binotto said on Sky Sports Italia.

"There have been protests, and there was the first verdict that said that what Racing Point did is illegal. This is a starting point.

"Stroll and Wolff may be furious, but there has been a violation of the regulations here.

"This is like copying a test. There are those who copy the test, and those who pass the test to have others copy it.

"I don't think there's anything to add to that. The facts are obvious. We are opponents and this is normal. Everyone looks at their own interest.

"We have laid down our intention to appeal. We believe that the sentence was not adequate, and we have four days to confirm it."

Mercedes has come into the spotlight in the case due to a transfer of parts that took place on 6 January - after the brake ducts had stopped being a non-listed part.

The stewards' ruling did not suggest Mercedes had wrongly passed any data concerning the brake ducts to Racing Point, with the 6 January transfer not expanding on the information that had previously been legitimately passed under the regulations.

Wolff said on Sunday that Mercedes had done nothing wrong in the case.

"We have done nothing wrong. I strongly believe that Racing Point has done nothing wrong," Wolff said.

"I believe that if this goes to the International Court of Appeal, the lawyers and the barristers have a strong opinion that this is a case that has very, very solid pillars, and therefore everybody's in a good place about that.

"If someone thinks that we have done something wrong, they should protest, and we're happy to go to court."

Previous article Williams explains position in Racing Point F1 case appeal
Next article How F1's COVID goodwill broke apart on its birthday weekend

Top Comments

Latest news