Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The not-so-obvious chance Leclerc missed to usurp Verstappen

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
The not-so-obvious chance Leclerc missed to usurp Verstappen

Cheshire cats de la Roche and Musgrave grin after Silverstone Historic F3 thrillers

National
National
Cheshire cats de la Roche and Musgrave grin after Silverstone Historic F3 thrillers

Dramatic Mini fight goes to the wire as Ovenden wins title by a point at Brands Hatch

National
National
Dramatic Mini fight goes to the wire as Ovenden wins title by a point at Brands Hatch

How Ingram made his mark on the 2026 BTCC campaign – before going out with a bang

BTCC
BTCC
Brands Hatch (Grand Prix Circuit)
How Ingram made his mark on the 2026 BTCC campaign – before going out with a bang

The hidden factor that gives Verstappen and Red Bull extra hope for 2027

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
The hidden factor that gives Verstappen and Red Bull extra hope for 2027

From Argentina to Mandalika: The path to Aprilia's ultimate MotoGP race result

MotoGP
MotoGP
Indonesian GP
From Argentina to Mandalika: The path to Aprilia's ultimate MotoGP race result

How last-lap heartbreak turned the Bathurst 1000 on its head

Supercars
Supercars
Bathurst 1000
How last-lap heartbreak turned the Bathurst 1000 on its head

Why Antonelli avoided a penalty despite four track limits incidents in Singapore GP

Formula 1
Formula 1
Singapore GP
Why Antonelli avoided a penalty despite four track limits incidents in Singapore GP

Motorsport Show: F1 needs easier technical terms for fans

Formula 1 should make its technical terms easier for fans to understand so it does not risk boring them with complicated vocabulary, according to this week's Motorsport Show panel

F1 has not been immune to the electrification of the automotive industry, with energy recovery systems first appearing in 2009 and the current engine regulations creating complicated turbocharged hybrids.

But the references to the MGU-K and MGU-H - motor generator unit 'kinetic' and 'heat' respectively - in the modern engines' energy recovery system have been questioned by Motorsport Show host Peter Windsor and his panellists.

When asked what the difference is between an MGU-K and an MGU-H, British Touring Car Championship series director Alan Gow jokes: "MG UK is one of the manufacturers in the BTCC funnily enough.

"I don't know and one of my pet hates is the engineering vernacular we now [have].

"No wonder audiences sit there with glazed eyes wondering what an MGU-H is."

Ex-McLaren F1 communications chief Matt Bishop replies: "I 100% agree.

"I think that the hegemony of engineers in F1 means that the vernacular has become engineer talk.

"You buy a car, it is called a hybrid. On F1 it has ERS. Nobody knows what that means.

"Why is DRS called DRS? It sounds like a sofa. Call it speed wing, something like that."

Gow says "even car manufacturers never related to KERS", in reference to the original kinetic energy recovery system F1 introduced in 2009.

Bishop replies: "When I was at McLaren, Mercedes was the engine supplier. They said 'can you please start calling it KERS-hybrid' in our press communications.

"Just get proper names for it."

Previous article Haas may alter 2019 design plans after wings rule change - Steiner
Next article Wolff: Multiple Mercedes drivers 'good problem to have'

Top Comments