Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Williams is still feeling the weight of expectation

Feature
Formula 1
Why Williams is still feeling the weight of expectation

Supercars Townsville: Waters takes second win of the season in Ford 1-2-3-4

Supercars
Townsville 500
Supercars Townsville: Waters takes second win of the season in Ford 1-2-3-4

Audi calls for F1 ADUO rethink amid exploit fears

Formula 1
British GP
Audi calls for F1 ADUO rethink amid exploit fears

Is Red Bull better or worse off one year after Horner's sacking? Our writers have their say

Formula 1
British GP
Is Red Bull better or worse off one year after Horner's sacking? Our writers have their say

Vinales: 'KTM sent me a contract, I signed it, and two weeks later they cancelled it'

MotoGP
German GP
Vinales: 'KTM sent me a contract, I signed it, and two weeks later they cancelled it'

One year on: How Red Bull changed post-Horner

Formula 1
British GP
One year on: How Red Bull changed post-Horner

How technical issues have cost Bagnaia 40 points in the MotoGP title fight

MotoGP
German GP
How technical issues have cost Bagnaia 40 points in the MotoGP title fight

Why there are no quick fixes for all of Verstappen’s frustrations at Red Bull

Feature
Formula 1
British GP
Why there are no quick fixes for all of Verstappen’s frustrations at Red Bull

Motorsport Show: F1 needs easier technical terms for fans

Formula 1 should make its technical terms easier for fans to understand so it does not risk boring them with complicated vocabulary, according to this week's Motorsport Show panel

F1 has not been immune to the electrification of the automotive industry, with energy recovery systems first appearing in 2009 and the current engine regulations creating complicated turbocharged hybrids.

But the references to the MGU-K and MGU-H - motor generator unit 'kinetic' and 'heat' respectively - in the modern engines' energy recovery system have been questioned by Motorsport Show host Peter Windsor and his panellists.

When asked what the difference is between an MGU-K and an MGU-H, British Touring Car Championship series director Alan Gow jokes: "MG UK is one of the manufacturers in the BTCC funnily enough.

"I don't know and one of my pet hates is the engineering vernacular we now [have].

"No wonder audiences sit there with glazed eyes wondering what an MGU-H is."

Ex-McLaren F1 communications chief Matt Bishop replies: "I 100% agree.

"I think that the hegemony of engineers in F1 means that the vernacular has become engineer talk.

"You buy a car, it is called a hybrid. On F1 it has ERS. Nobody knows what that means.

"Why is DRS called DRS? It sounds like a sofa. Call it speed wing, something like that."

Gow says "even car manufacturers never related to KERS", in reference to the original kinetic energy recovery system F1 introduced in 2009.

Bishop replies: "When I was at McLaren, Mercedes was the engine supplier. They said 'can you please start calling it KERS-hybrid' in our press communications.

"Just get proper names for it."

Previous article Haas may alter 2019 design plans after wings rule change - Steiner
Next article Wolff: Multiple Mercedes drivers 'good problem to have'

Top Comments