The rights and wrongs of superlicence revamp
MARCUS SIMMONS investigates how the FIA's superlicence points system could change the process of reaching F1, and how it would've impacted on history as well as its future implications
The talent of Max Verstappen has a lot to answer for. Although his graduation to Formula 1 for 2015 at the age of 17, with just one season in car racing under his belt, will never be cited officially as the reason for the FIA's new superlicence qualification rules, it's surely no coincidence that these measures have been revealed at this time.
Verstappen's promotion from Formula 3 European Championship sensation to F1 fledgling has been controversial, with many arguing against it not because of his experience, but his age. Under the new-for-2016 rules he would fail on three counts: he isn't yet 18; he has scored only 20 of the 40 points required; and he hasn't amassed the two seasons of experience in the prescribed championships.
One of the biggest issues is whether the sport even needed the new superlicence qualification rules. Verstappen is an incredibly gifted driver, he has fantastic racecraft, unbelievable car control, and a maturity beyond his years with a very strong sense - and opinions - of what's right and wrong.
On the other hand, Pastor Maldonado enters his fifth season of F1 as the field's most maligned competitor, with serious doubts over his racing judgement, yet he would easily have acquired a superlicence under all of the FIA's new conditions for his rookie campaign in 2011.
If we accept that yes, something needed to be done (with the emphasis on 'if'), we move onto the question of why the FIA has weighted particular championships in the way it has done.
![]() Formula Renault 3.5 hasn't fared well in the FIA rankings © LAT
|
There's been a lot of criticism on social media that, in its grading of Formula Renault 3.5 and GP3 below European F3, and its awarding of a scant five points to FRenault 2.0 champions compared to 10 for national/regional FIA Formula 4 title winners, the governing body is shamelessly promoting its own initiatives and encouraging drivers to F3, F4 and the speculative 'future Formula 2' (weighted more heavily than anything, GP2 included).
This, of course, is the same FIA that dodged brickbats for years for doing nothing to streamline the cluttered single-seater ladder.
Some very well-articulated arguments from FR2.0 competitors (Jack Aitken, we mean you) complain about the category's feeble weighting, but let's look at it from another angle. If an FR2.0 champion graduates to Euro F3 or FR3.5, as we would expect them to, and has a couple of strong seasons, then they have their superlicence, and it could even be that the small points they score from FR2.0 make the difference in crossing the magical threshold of 40.
Even so, this is a very public slighting by the FIA of FR2.0, a category that was already enduring a considerably tougher winter than before, thanks in part to karters looking to go straight to F3 (we can blame Verstappen again for that!), and also to the strong take-up of the new FIA F4. One leading team we spoke to before Christmas said it was struggling to attract drivers for FR2.0 compared to previous years, and one manager of drivers at FR2.0 level said that he's in no hurry to place his clients for 2015 as seats will be vacant for much longer than usual.
As for knock-on effects of the new rules, some have argued that they will allow drivers to develop at a natural rate without being rushed Verstappen-style towards F1. That's a good point. Drivers of Verstappen's ability come along very seldom and pushing a driver too far too soon will often result in them not being able to build the necessary skill sets required to survive - let alone thrive - at the top.
On the other hand, there will be some drivers of outstanding natural talent, but without the necessary finance to compete for a full season with a frontrunning team at, say, GP2 or FR3.5 level, who fall through the cracks. This is undoubtedly a negative aspect of the new rules. Damon Hill (in his case in Formula 3000) and Nigel Mansell (in F2), for instance, would not have qualified.
![]() Hill's F3000 record wouldn't have been sufficient © LAT
|
Regarding the weighting of those series that aren't European ladder championships, there have been criticisms of the low weighting for IndyCar and Japan's Super Formula. But both these series have a very similar field year after year, giving plenty of time to notch up superlicence points - and most of the drivers in Super Formula who you'd want to see in F1 compete in LMP1 in the World Endurance Championship anyway. Talking of which, some have argued that LMP2 should not have been excluded, but would we really want the likes of Sergey Zlobin qualifying for a superlicence?
You could say that the DTM is a glaring omission, but the tactics and strategy of the large manufacturer squads means that the championship order is seldom an accurate reflection of driver talent.
We asked Mercedes if reserve driver Pascal Wehrlein would qualify for a superlicence in 2016, and the answer was that the team didn't know! If he doesn't, then he'll have no chance of ever qualifying for one unless he goes to race in GP2 or gets some F1 races under his belt this year.
Marco Wittmann - a man who'd be entirely capable in F1 - is in a similar situation. Ditto Daniel Juncadella.
Looking at the current drivers in F1, it's clear that many of the superstars wouldn't have been eligible to race at the top level under the FIA's new rules. While this illustrates a failing of such a system, we also have to consider whether drivers would have chosen a different career path had they risen through the ranks under such regulations. We also have to bear in mind how championships would have been differently weighted at the time when those drivers were in the junior levels.
For example, Daniel Ricciardo wouldn't have qualified when he made his F1 debut with HRT in mid-2011 (although the points from his parallel FR3.5 campaign would have seen him safely over the hurdle for '12), but at that time there was no FIA European F3 Championship. It's highly possible, therefore, that national F3, including the British series he won in '09, would have been weighted more heavily, thereby allowing him to race with HRT in '11.
![]() On paper, Vettel wouldn't have the required points, but only because the junior landscape has changed © XPB
|
Carlos Sainz Jr (another non-qualifier) might have decided that he would add F3 to his GP3 programme in 2013. Had he done so he would probably have scored sufficient points to get him in for '15.
Then there's Sebastian Vettel. He wouldn't have qualified for a superlicence for his mid-2007 F1 debut if you apply the current table literally, but with no FIA F4 in his era you have to expect that Formula BMW would have taken its place, and his crushing '04 season sees him through.
If we go further back in time to apply the rules, Ayrton Senna - who rose up the ranks at a time when there was an FIA European F3 Championship - could have competed in the European series instead of the British. Even if he hadn't won it, he would have scored sufficient points from FF2000 and FF1600 - which probably would have featured in a small way in the superlicence table - to take up his Toleman F1 drive in 1984.
Michael Schumacher? Like Ricciardo, he came along at a time when there was no FIA F3 championship, so German F3 - in which he competed for two seasons - could have been weighted highly enough to get him through, and that's without taking his Group C outings into account.
But whichever way you look at it, all this would leave Jenson Button out in the cold for 2000, Kimi Raikkonen in '01, and highly possibly Fernando Alonso for '01 and Mika Hakkinen in 1991. And should Robin Frijns, surely the most wasted talent of recent years, somehow find an F1 drive for 2016, he wouldn't qualify either.
![]() Raikkonen's famous Formula Renault to Formula 1 leap would have been impossible © LAT
|
This goes to prove the undesirability of black-and-white regulations when there are thousands of shades of grey in between. Having taken the decision to implement these rules, the FIA has devised a qualification table that could do what everyone has wanted for ages: a decluttering of the single-seater ladder. But it's almost certain that there will be an unfortunate cost to the careers of some drivers too.
Instead, or perhaps complementing this table, the sport could do with an arbiter of talent - an individual, or perhaps a three or four-person commission - with the power to grant a superlicence to a deserving case who otherwise falls short. This would be in much the same way as Charlie Whiting has jurisdiction on sporting and technical matters, and would have to be someone with an intrinsic knowledge of the junior ranks and with first-hand experience of watching the competitors and talking to their teams and engineers. Only then could we be sure that we have an entirely fair system.
Table 1: current F1 drivers and how many superlicence points they would have had at the time of their debut
Eligible for superlicence: Nico Hulkenberg 110 Lewis Hamilton 98 Pastor Maldonado 68 Nico Rosberg 63 Romain Grosjean 60 Felipe Nasr 52 Valtteri Bottas 50 Sebastian Vettel 48 Sergio Perez 42 Daniil Kvyat 42 Not eligible for superlicence: Daniel Ricciardo 38 Carlos Sainz Jr 38 Felipe Massa 30 Fernando Alonso 30 Max Verstappen 20 Jenson Button 15 Marcus Ericsson 14 Kimi Raikkonen 5
There are several provisos here. The F3 Euro Series of 2003-11 is regarded as having the same value as the FIA F3 European Championship of 2012 to date. National Formula BMW (Vettel) is given a national F4 rating, as is British Formula Ford (Button). Euro 3000 (Massa) is given the same weighting as Super Formula. FIA F3000 (Alonso) is given a GP2 rating, with the old two-litre Formula Nissan (Alonso again) equated with national F3.
Table 2: How the scores would look if the rules were introduced for 2015
![]() Fernando Alonso only had a brief pre-F1 career, including a star underdog stint in F3000 in 2000 © LAT
|
This includes drivers who have started grands prix but have not contested the requisite number of races in the past three years.
According to unofficial sources at the FIA, it appears likely that drivers can count scores from multiple series in the same year (eg Duval and Nakajima with Super Formula and WEC, de Vries with Formula Renault Eurocup and ALPS).
Also, the varying rules in nationally-run F3 series mean some would qualify, some not: Japan looks OK, Germany and Britain probably fine, Euroformula Open possibly not although the FIA is open to discussion.
We have also included the Italian series (which collapsed at the end of 2012) for the purposes of this table, although points from this will be discarded for 2016. Additionally, we have italicised those who have not completed 80 per cent of two seasons in the requisite championships.
Eligible for superlicence: Andre Lotterer 132 Marcel Fassler 100 Benoit Treluyer 100 Tom Kristensen 80 Will Power 80 Scott Dixon 80 Raffaele Marciello 74 Loic Duval 70 Allan McNish 70 Helio Castroneves 70 Stoffel Vandoorne 65 Anthony Davidson 60 Sebastien Buemi 60 Jolyon Palmer 56 Fabio Leimer 56 Sam Bird 55 Felix Rosenqvist 53 Felipe Nasr 52 Alex Lynn 52 Mitch Evans 50 Davide Valsecchi 50 Kazuki Nakajima 50 Ryan Hunter-Reay 50 Esteban Ocon 41 James Calado 40 Luiz Razia 40 Daniel Juncadella 40 Antonio Felix da Costa 40 Not eligible for superlicence: Tom Blomqvist 39 Carlos Sainz Jr 38 Alexander Wurz 38 Nicolas Lapierre 36 Simon Pagenaud 36 Neel Jani 30 Robin Frijns 30 Stephane Sarrazin 28 Lucas Auer 27 Romain Dumas 26 Marvin Kirchhofer 25 Pierre Gasly 25 Joao Paulo de Oliveira 25 Jordan King 23 Max Verstappen 20 Marc Lieb 20 Dean Stoneman 20 Jimmy Eriksson 20 Facu Regalia 20 Conor Daly 20 Daniel Abt 20 Naoki Yamamoto 20 Stefano Coletti 18 Nicolas Prost 17 Nick Yelloly 17 Jack Harvey 17 Yuichi Nakayama 17 Roberto Merhi 15 Will Stevens 15 Koudai Tsukakoshi 15 Oliver Rowland 14 Johnny Cecotto Jr 13 Antonio Fuoco 13 Antonio Giovinazzi 13 Emil Bernstorff 13 Lucas di Grassi 12 Tio Ellinas 12 Takuya Izawa 12 Will Buller 11 Aaro Vainio 11 Ryo Hirakawa 11 Nobuharu Matsushita 11 Arthur Pic 10 Pascal Wehrlein 10 Juan Pablo Montoya 10 Marco Andretti 10 Lance Stroll 10 Martin Cao 10 Riccardo Agostini 10 Markus Pommer 10 Nyck de Vries 10 Harry Tincknell 9 Mathias Beche 9 Sergey Sirotkin 9 Takamoto Katsuta 9 Rinaldo Capello 8 Nico Muller 8 Marco Sorensen 8 Stephane Richelmi 7 Jake Dennis 7 Matias Laine 7 Mattia Drudi 7 Matt Rao 7 Jazeman Jaafar 7 Eddie Cheever 7 Nabil Jeffri 7 Artem Markelov 7 Kenta Yamashita 7 Tony Kanaan 6 Justin Wilson 6 James Hinchcliffe 6 Ryan Briscoe 6 Norman Nato 6 Sven Muller 5 Dario Franchitti 5 Nigel Melker 5 Hiroaki Ishiura 5 Andrea Russo 5 Camren Kaminsky 5 Felix Serralles 5 Brandon Maisano 5 Indy Dontje 5 Kimiya Sato 5 Mitsunori Takaboshi 5 Katsumasa Chiyo 5 Hideki Yamauchi 5 Ben Barnicoat 5 Matt Parry 5 Nick Heidfeld 4 Jonny Kane 4 Nick Leventis 4 Danny Watts 4 Tsugio Matsuda 4 Sam MacLeod 4 Dennis Olsen 4 Alexander Rossi 3 Pipo Derani 3 Alexander Sims 3 Harold Primat 3 Andrea Belicchi 3 Carlos Munoz 3 Dino Zamparelli 3 Kevin Korjus 3 Patric Niederhauser 3 James Rossiter 3 Tomoki Nojiri 3 Louis Deletraz 3 Jack Aitken 3 Charles Leclerc 3 Luca Ghiotto 3 Julian Leal 2 Tom Dillmann 2 Nicholas Latifi 2 Michael Lewis 2 Brendon Hartley 2 Timo Bernhard 2 Marc Gene 2 Oliver Jarvis 2 Charlie Kimball 2 Richie Stanaway 2 Matthieu Vaxiviere 2 Yuji Kunimoto 2 Takashi Kogure 2 Kazuya Oshima 2 Leonardo Pulcini 2 Felipe Guimaraes 2 Henrique Martins 2 Gustavo Menezes 2 Mitch Gilbert 2 Richard Bradley 2 David Brabham 1 Peter Dumbreck 1 Karun Chandhok 1 Sebastien Bourdais 1 Graham Rahal 1 Jann Mardenborough 1 Kevin Ceccon 1 Marlon Stockinger 1 Alain Valente 1 Peter Li 1 Weiron Tan 1 John Bryant-Meisner 1 Daiki Sasaki 1 Alexander Albon 1 Seb Morris 1 Josh Hill 1 Matevos Isaakyan 1 Bruno Bonifacio 1 Paul-Loup Chatin 1

Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.





Top Comments