Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Mercedes shoots down favouritism speculation between Russell and Antonelli

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Mercedes shoots down favouritism speculation between Russell and Antonelli

MotoGP Czech GP: Marquez outduels Bagnaia to score back-to-back wins

MotoGP
Czech GP
MotoGP Czech GP: Marquez outduels Bagnaia to score back-to-back wins

What next for Formula 1’s rules?

Feature
Formula 1
What next for Formula 1’s rules?

How a racing novice crept up to speed in a Beetle-engined stalwart

Feature
National
How a racing novice crept up to speed in a Beetle-engined stalwart

Aston Martin's harsh reality was exposed in Monaco and Barcelona

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Aston Martin's harsh reality was exposed in Monaco and Barcelona

Supercars Darwin: De Pasquale takes commanding Hidden Valley victory

Supercars
Darwin Triple Crown
Supercars Darwin: De Pasquale takes commanding Hidden Valley victory

Bezzecchi issues apology being hit with Czech GP ban for striking marshal

MotoGP
Czech GP
Bezzecchi issues apology being hit with Czech GP ban for striking marshal

Live: MotoGP Czech Grand Prix as it happens

MotoGP
Czech GP
Live: MotoGP Czech Grand Prix as it happens

Force India's long-running legal dispute with Aerolab settled

Force India's long-running legal dispute with Aerolab, Mike Gascoyne and the Caterham F1 team has been settled at the High Court of Justice in London today

Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the team had "come nowhere near" establishing that Aerolab had systematically copied significant parts of Force India's design when designing the Team Lotus T127.

Aerolab had previously partnered with Vijay Mallya's squad until late July 2009, when it decided to terminate the contract due to unpaid fees. Caterham, called Lotus Racing at the time the dispute occurred, came on board several days later.

A 14-day hearing was held in the Chancery Division of the London High Court, with a number of experts including Frank Dernie, ex-Ligier technical director who has acted as a consultant for both Williams and Toyota in Formula 1.

On the evidence provided, Mr Justice Arnold settled in Aerolab's favour the dispute over unpaid fees to the sum of €850,000.

He awarded Force India €25,000 in compensation in regard to use of its intellectual property rights, which was deemed to have been done as a short cut.

"Such misuse as I have found to have occurred mainly consisted of opportunistic copying of CAD files by CAD designers in order to take a short cut," Mr Justice Arnold added.

Jean-Claude Migeot, Aerolab's managing director, said in a statement he was relieved a verdict had been reached.

"It has taken a long time but I am extremely happy and relieved to see 1Malaysia Racing Team [Caterham F1, then Team Lotus] and Mike Gascoyne cleared of any wrongdoing," he said.

"I have always felt that the case was only initiated by Force India as a means to delay payment for outstanding work. With the Court having now examined the often extremely technical aspects of the evidence and come to the decision it has, my viewpoint has not altered.

"After two years of legal dispute, I am looking forward to once again focusing all of my attention on current and future Aerolab/FondTech projects."

A separate hearing will be held to determine the covering of legal costs associated with the trial.

Previous article Button admits he was not expecting McLaren to be so strong in Australia
Next article Aerolab vindicated by Force India ruling

Top Comments