Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

What has changed as FOM and FIA appear more aligned on F1's future?

Feature
Formula 1
What has changed as FOM and FIA appear more aligned on F1's future?

Ex-F1 race director Wittich defends Masi's decision-making at 2021 Abu Dhabi GP

Formula 1
Abu Dhabi GP
Ex-F1 race director Wittich defends Masi's decision-making at 2021 Abu Dhabi GP

Bearman blames Colapinto for "unacceptable" crash at Suzuka

Formula 1
Japanese GP
Bearman blames Colapinto for "unacceptable" crash at Suzuka

Hakkinen vs Schumacher: Macau 1990 watchalong with Anthony Davidson

General
Hakkinen vs Schumacher: Macau 1990 watchalong with Anthony Davidson

Quartararo staying “a little bit out” of Yamaha development as frustrations grow

MotoGP
Quartararo staying “a little bit out” of Yamaha development as frustrations grow

Is it now or never for Russell in hunt for F1 title?

Feature
Formula 1
Is it now or never for Russell in hunt for F1 title?

Supercars to make Chevrolet Camaro updates after parity investigation

Supercars
Taupo Super 440
Supercars to make Chevrolet Camaro updates after parity investigation

Domenicali: F1 'needs to decide' on the next engine regulations this year

Formula 1
Domenicali: F1 'needs to decide' on the next engine regulations this year

Lotus expresses disappointment at FIA's decision to ban its reactive ride system

Lotus has expressed its disappointment at the FIA's decision to ban its reactive ride system for the 2012 season - but does not believe the move will hurt its performance too much

The Enstone-based outfit had caused a stir at the start of this year when it emerged it was planning to run a radical system that maintained the ride-height of the car under braking. As well as providing an aerodynamic boost, this would improve stability.

While some other teams looked at developing their own systems, others suggested that the device was illegal - and in the end the FIA advised that it felt reactive ride should not be allowed because it was principally providing an aerodynamic benefit.

Lotus team principal Eric Boullier said he was far from happy that the FIA made that decision, having given his outfit the green light to pursue the concept as long ago as January 2010.

"I have to say it is very disappointing," he said when asked by AUTOSPORT about his team's reaction to the ban.

"We spent a lot of time and energy, plus money as well, to build a group that is bringing innovation and work into the system. It takes time to put this suspension in place, and took us a couple of years.

"Obviously we are not stupid, every time we go through the process, we go to the FIA, and the FIA is backing us up. Then, when you start to use it, to see it banned with no discussion is always frustrating. We have to respect the rule, but it is frustrating."

Lotus technical director James Allison believed that the decision to ban the reactive ride concept was a normal part of life in F1 - with teams constantly trying to push the envelope of the regulations to find an advantage.

"Honestly I think it was just part of the cut-and-thrust of F1 development," he told AUTOSPORT in an exclusive interview. "It is not without precedent, is it?

"There are lots and lots of times where we have been the beneficiary of that type of decision and other times when it has gone against us. But it is part of F1 that you try to come up with ideas that are novel interpretations.

"Charlie [Whiting] can give you an opinion, but then he can hear other arguments and he can then be swung by those. That is just a genuine part of the sport."

Previous article D'Ambrosio rules out racing in other series in addition to his Lotus reserve role
Next article Maldonado says the experience gained during his first F1 season will aid Williams's 2012 development

Top Comments

Latest news