Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

MotoGP bans front holeshot devices immediately, tweaks grid layout from German GP

MotoGP
Dutch GP
MotoGP bans front holeshot devices immediately, tweaks grid layout from German GP

Milicevic's Cooper in command at Cadwell Park VSCC medley

National
Milicevic's Cooper in command at Cadwell Park VSCC medley

Why Le Mans wasn't a manufactured illusion

Feature
WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Why Le Mans wasn't a manufactured illusion

What happens next as appeal against Gasly's Monaco podium decision goes to court

Formula 1
Austrian GP
What happens next as appeal against Gasly's Monaco podium decision goes to court

How Lundgaard emulated Tracy’s 2000 charge at Road America

Feature
IndyCar
Road America
How Lundgaard emulated Tracy’s 2000 charge at Road America

Obituary: Ferrari’s first monocoque maker John Thompson

General
Obituary: Ferrari’s first monocoque maker John Thompson

Retro tin-tops entertain at Brands Hatch London Historic Trophy event

National
Retro tin-tops entertain at Brands Hatch London Historic Trophy event

Why Aprilia appealed against Bezzecchi’s Czech MotoGP ban

MotoGP
Czech GP
Why Aprilia appealed against Bezzecchi’s Czech MotoGP ban

Brawn: Teams may need to copy RBR

Mercedes GP team principal Ross Brawn believes Red Bull Racing's rivals may need to adopt its high rear ride-height concept if it is found to be a big contributor to its front-wing advantage

Amid ongoing controversy about the way that Red Bull Racing's front wing runs much lower to the ground than other cars, the reigning world champion has defended its approach by claiming that its situation is helped by it simply choosing to run with more rake than rivals.

Brawn believes that, with the FIA having found no problem with the visible flexing of the RB7's front wing with tougher deflection tests, it was now up to teams to decide if they wished to pursue Red Bull Racing's approach to car design.

"There's a regulation which says that the bodywork should be rigid," explained Brawn at Sepang. "We all know that's impossible because everything moves. It's a question of degrees, so the FIA has a series of tests to measure the degree to which bodywork moves and, as long as you pass those tests, then your car is to all intents and purposes legal.

"Those tests can change, in fact they changed over the winter because, as they do in a lot of areas, the FIA try and improve those tests. There's a new test this year. Red Bull obviously pass it so that's all there is to say about it.

"They've got a philosophy of their car and approach, and teams have got to decide if that's the reason - or one of the reasons - for their level of performance. If it is, then you need to consider going that route yourself, or make sure it's not an excuse for the fact they're winning everything at the moment.

"It's a philosophy. It ties in a lot with the whole car concept. It's fair to say that probably, over the winter, a lot of teams assumed with the new test that the situation was going to change and it hasn't, so we're faced with what we have and we have to make sure we produce as competitive a car as we can and comply to the FIA tests."

Renault team principal Eric Boullier added that his team would keep a close eye on the Red Bull Racing situation to decide if it was a route that the Enstone-outfit needed to consider.

"They [Red Bull Racing] are running a different set-up with more rake and we also went a different way, with a different philosophy, so we keep an eye on them, obviously, because you also look at the fastest cars on the track, especially when it's constantly fastest," he explained. "But we don't know if we will go this way or not."

Previous article Degradation set to create Sepang thriller
Next article Red Bull fast but facing a tough weekend

Top Comments

Latest news