Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

General
Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

Video: What makes a good F1 driver and race engineer partnership

Formula 1
Video: What makes a good F1 driver and race engineer partnership

Formula E launches innovative Gen4 car at Paul Ricard

Formula E
Formula E launches innovative Gen4 car at Paul Ricard

How to make F1's 2026 rules simpler - and why Horner was half-right

Feature
Formula 1
How to make F1's 2026 rules simpler - and why Horner was half-right

Wood is a chip off the old block as he takes first win at Brands Hatch 750MC event

National
Wood is a chip off the old block as he takes first win at Brands Hatch 750MC event

Why riders' nationalities have become a problem for Liberty Media in MotoGP

MotoGP
Spanish GP
Why riders' nationalities have become a problem for Liberty Media in MotoGP

McLaren junior leads the way in British F4 as BTCC support series begin at Donington Park

National
McLaren junior leads the way in British F4 as BTCC support series begin at Donington Park

The key takeaways from the BTCC season opener

Feature
BTCC
Donington Park (National Circuit)
The key takeaways from the BTCC season opener

Bring ground effect back, says Michael

Williams technical director Sam Michael has suggested that a reintroduction of ground effect cars could be the answer to improving the opportunities for overtaking in Formula One

While current proposals to come up with a new technical package for 2011 are geared primarily towards increasing F1's energy efficiency, its relevance to road cars and its environmental impact, the plans are also seen as an opportunity to improve the sporting element.

According to Michael, the return of ground effect - where a low-pressure area is created below the car, effectively sucking it to the road - is an idea worthy of consideration.

"When you have cars that create loads of downforce, it's pretty difficult to achieve passing," he said. "Going towards categories that have less downforce and power doesn't seem like the solution. Look at F3; it's the most boring racing you can ever watch. Reducing the downforce isn't the solution for F1.

"I do think you can benefit from following the experience F1 had in the 1980s of using ground effect more than we do now. The things that have probably made F1 worse is getting rid of ground effect, and lifting the front wing - it's gone up 150mm in the last five years. Both those things made the cars very sensitive to onset flow."

Michael said that any leap in performance that ground effects may bring about could easily be managed by adapting the tyres.

"You need to adjust performance elsewhere, but you can do that with the tyre," he explained. "If the cars get too fast, Bridgestone can change that from one race to the next. It's quite easy - and we should make an advantage from that."

While the idea would undoubtedly be a hard sell to all of the teams, Michael insisted that it could be made viable.

"Every time we've looked at doing that before, we've seen that it costs £2m to make two cars and everyone says they can't be bothered paying for that.

"I don't think it's too risky to go to a ground effect car. The OWG [Overtaking Working Group] proposal does not include adjustable wings."

Ground effect is currently featured in the Champ Car World Series, although its use was severely diminished in F1 when flat undertrays were made mandatory in 1983.

Previous article Firm in new bid to secure British GP
Next article Q & A with Spyker's Colin Kolles

Top Comments