Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

How to watch F1® on Apple TV for the Formula 1® Crypto.com Miami Grand Prix 2026

Formula 1
Miami GP
How to watch F1® on Apple TV for the Formula 1® Crypto.com Miami Grand Prix 2026

Why OEM involvement has caused vast problems for F1 and the FIA

Feature
Formula 1
Miami GP
Why OEM involvement has caused vast problems for F1 and the FIA

The current parallels between Red Bull and a post-Schumacher Benetton

Feature
Formula 1
The current parallels between Red Bull and a post-Schumacher Benetton

Has the WRC’s newest constructor unearthed a game changing concept?

Feature
WRC
Rally Islas Canarias
Has the WRC’s newest constructor unearthed a game changing concept?

Salucci claims VR46 is the top Ducati team in MotoGP

MotoGP
Spanish GP
Salucci claims VR46 is the top Ducati team in MotoGP

FIA agrees with F1: "We cannot be hostage to automotive companies"

Formula 1
Miami GP
FIA agrees with F1: "We cannot be hostage to automotive companies"

The uncomfortable questions posed by Marc Marquez’s recent MotoGP form

Feature
MotoGP
Jerez Official Testing
The uncomfortable questions posed by Marc Marquez’s recent MotoGP form

How F1 rule changes to improve safety could also remove "unintended overtaking"

Formula 1
Miami GP
How F1 rule changes to improve safety could also remove "unintended overtaking"

F1's 2017 regulation changes tougher than '09, says Williams chief

Williams technical chief Pat Symonds believes the challenge posed by the revamped 2017 regulations is more difficult than Formula 1 teams encountered in 2009

Outfits will have to develop their solutions for 2017 with heavily restricted windtunnel hours and staff numbers, compared to the last round of sweeping aerodynamic changes six years ago.

That, Symonds feels, will test how resources are balanced between 2016 and '17 challengers.

"It's going to leave a lot of people in my position with a lot of difficult decisions to make next year because life is different to 2009, which is when we last had a big change of rules," Symonds told Autosport.

"Back then you could say, 'I'm going to employ another 30 aerodynamicists, I'm going to run the tunnel a bit harder, I'm going to do this that and the other'.

"You can't do that now. You have your 70 runs-a-week and that is it.

"So people like me have to make some hard decisions as to how much you develop next year's car and how much you concentrate on 2017."

Brawn GP was the commanding pacesetter in 2009, largely because it elected to - while competing as Honda - write off '08 and reallocate resources.

However, Symonds does not expect a similar situation in 2017, unless a team stumbles across a concept like Brawn's double diffuser.

"I don't think it is going to allow anyone to suddenly break away and do a much better job than anyone else because they have done more work," he said.

"They might do a better job because they have seen something, like the double diffuser in 2009 or whatever.

"For Williams, I do agree that it is an opportunity.

"I'd like to think maybe by 2017, maybe the budget keeps coming up and maybe we'll have a new set of rules and maybe that can be our next steps forward."

When they start running, the 2017 cars are set to look more aesthetically pleasing, Symonds suggests.

"It's ended up with a bigger diffuser, a big diffuser actually," he said.

"There is a substantial front wing and some, I think, attractive styling. It's a little bit retro.

"The brief from the Strategy Group was to make the cars quicker and to make the styling a bit better, I think we've done those two."

Previous article Sergio Perez tips Force India to fight for Formula 1 fourth place
Next article F1 rookies Verstappen and Sainz "surprisingly good" says Toro Rosso

Top Comments

Latest news