Click to view our fantastic subscription offers

Instant access to the F1 paddock

You have 15 views remaining

You have read 15 stories this month. After 30, you will need to register or subscribe.

Register with us for free to view 50 stories a month.

Or subscribe to AUTOSPORT+ for unlimited news stories and access to our exclusive subscriber-only content.

Our commitment to quality journalism

We've introduced metered access to AUTOSPORT which will ensure that the majority of our visitors can continue to view the site for free. But we think that is worth a small investment from those who use it most, so that we can continue to send the leading experts in their field to motor racing paddocks all over the world to break the latest news and produce the most compelling interviews and race reports.

Every visitor gets 30 free page views per month. Once you reach the limit you can register to get 50 views or choose one of our value-for-money subscription packages to continue viewing and to get additional access to a range of features including:

  • Unlimited access to AUTOSPORT with news and views from the paddock
  • Enjoy AUTOSPORT+: subscriber-only analysis, comment and top-quality pictures
  • Get AUTOSPORT magazine in a digital format on your computer or iPad every week
  • Full access to FORIX - the world's best motorsport statistics website

We greatly appreciate your continued support to keep AUTOSPORT at the forefront of motorsport coverage, and we look forward to welcoming you as a new subscriber.

Glenn Freeman Editor
Find out more about our subscriptions

Lotus boss Lopez calls for F1 prize money structure rethink

Formula 1 must rethink its prize money structure if it is going to guarantee the survival of all its teams, claims Lotus owner Gerard Lopez.

Amid growing concerns about F1's costs spiralling out of control, there has been an increased focus on the way that its prize fund heavily favours the top teams and ends up sealing their advantage.

F1's biggest earners Ferrari and Red Bull took home around 100 million each last year from their share of the commercial rights money that is given to teams.

That is vastly more than the 40 million Lotus got for finishing fourth - or the 6 million that Caterham got for finishing in the top 10.

With the huge disparity between the top and bottom teams being in stark contrast to the way other sports operate, Lopez thinks that the payments need looking at again.

Although his team agreed to its payment plan when it signed a bilateral agreement with Bernie Ecclestone two years ago, he says the financial situation in F1 has changed enough to warrant a rethink.

"The sport needs to find a better way to encapsulate financial equity," he told AUTOSPORT.

"What was true two years ago is maybe not true anymore - in terms of where the sport is going.

"Two years ago we were told the engines would last longer and be cheaper than what we had - but they are now almost twice as expensive.

"The bilaterals are what was true two years ago. What is true today is that F1 still has to attract sponsors, which it still hasn't done like it did in the early 2000s or late 1990s.

"That is something where two years ago people thought the world would come around."

Formula 1's unfair revenue sharing

Lopez believes F1's chiefs should do more to protect the interest of all the participants, and not just the top outfits.

"It is not a sport that can afford to lose many, if any, teams," he said. "If you were playing the Champions League, and there was a risk of losing Real Madrid, Barcelona or Bayern Munich, you just could not imagine it.

"It should be the same way in F1. The idea should be to have almost a franchise system, and work out how do you more equally distribute the revenues.

"I am not saying everyone has to get the same - but how do you make sure every team at each level has enough to sustain a good campaign and provide a good spectacle."

But as well as a better distribution of the sport's income, Lopez thinks that some form of cost control is essential too - which he thinks will be best served by clamping down on aerodynamic development.

"It would be too easy to say that we all want money, because F1 is designed in such a way that if you get more you spend more.

"So how do you make sure that you also stabilise the cost base, so you don't have situations that get out of hand."

  More news  
Read the AUTOSPORT Digital Edition
Visit the shop
See highlights from 60 years of AUTOSPORT
Paddock insight from group F1 editor Jonathan Noble
Grand Prix news updates from F1 editor Edd Straw
Breaking news feed
Live commentary feed