Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

What could drive McLaren to build its own F1 engine

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
What could drive McLaren to build its own F1 engine

Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Hamilton details ADUO order as Mercedes and Ferrari get F1 engine help

No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Feature
Formula 1
Monaco GP
No more naysayers, surely? How Monaco proved Antonelli's searing form wasn't just luck

Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Alpine requests right of review with FIA over penalties which cost Monaco GP podium

Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Le Mans 24 Hours: Aston Martin fastest at test day

Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Cadillac loses maiden F1 point as Perez penalised

Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Russell “beyond frustration” after dismal, point-less Monaco GP

Why so many F1 drivers were penalised for pitlane speeding in Monaco GP

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Why so many F1 drivers were penalised for pitlane speeding in Monaco GP

Brawn disappointed Mercedes' wing debate is dragging on for third straight race

Ross Brawn has said he is disappointed that the row over the Mercedes rear wing has dragged into a third race, with Lotus having now lodged a protest against it

Speaking before a scheduled meeting with race stewards to discuss the legality of the DRS-activated F-duct on the W03, Brawn said he believed the matter should have been cleared up earlier in the campaign.

"I think it is disappointing after three races that we are still in this situation," he explained before being notified of Lotus' protest.

"The system hasn't changed and the FIA's position hasn't changed, and as far as I understand their arguments haven't changed. So if they protest now, why didn't they protest in Australia? There is nothing new."

Brawn said that he was baffled about why rival teams had got so worked up over the system - especially because he reckoned its benefit was marginal.

"It is a bit of a puzzle," he explained. "Obviously there are benefits in the system but I think Lotus was quoted that they are getting a 0.2 second benefit upgrade here. Well, I can promise you that our system is not [worth] 0.2 of a second - particularly in a race when you only get to use it whenever you overtake.

"The effort and time that has gone into it seems to be disproportionate, so it does seem to be a strange situation."

Brawn also reiterated that the concept of using the DRS-system for an extra benefit was ratified as long ago as 2010.

"It is a matter of record that in 2010 Charlie [Whiting] stated that such a system was legal. It is in the minutes of the [technical] working group meetings. The question was asked and he stated his opinion then that he considered it legal. It has not been going on for three races. It has been going on for two years."

Previous article Alonso insists he is expecting a tough weekend in China despite Malaysian triumph
Next article Hamilton still gunning for victory in Chinese GP despite five-place grid penalty

Top Comments

Latest news