Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Super Formula Fuji: Ohta charge denies O’Sullivan maiden win

Super Formula
Fuji
Super Formula Fuji: Ohta charge denies O’Sullivan maiden win

Rovanpera provides comeback update during Rally Estonia visit

WRC
Rally Estonia
Rovanpera provides comeback update during Rally Estonia visit

The surprise highest points scorer in MotoGP's European leg

MotoGP
The surprise highest points scorer in MotoGP's European leg

How Colapinto has survived and thrived in the hothouse intensity of F1

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
How Colapinto has survived and thrived in the hothouse intensity of F1

Why Hamilton sees Mercedes as ‘still the team to beat’ at Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Why Hamilton sees Mercedes as ‘still the team to beat’ at Belgian GP

WRC Estonia: Unbeatable Pajari leads after perfect Friday

WRC
Rally Estonia
WRC Estonia: Unbeatable Pajari leads after perfect Friday

"Not getting ahead of ourselves" - Why Norris was downbeat in Belgium despite F1 practice pace

Formula 1
Belgian GP
"Not getting ahead of ourselves" - Why Norris was downbeat in Belgium despite F1 practice pace

Alpine explains Gasly's crash that red-flagged FP2

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Alpine explains Gasly's crash that red-flagged FP2

Sauber seeks answers on wing design

Sauber will conduct a detailed investigation at its factory into how its rear wing failed to comply with the technical regulations at the Australian Grand Prix, before it decides whether to keep pressing ahead with its appeal

The Swiss-based team has submitted its intention to appeal against the disqualifications of Sergio Perez and Kamui Kobayashi from the Melbourne event for a rear wing breach.

The rear wings did not comply with Articles 3.10.1 and 3.10.2 of the F1 Technical Regulations that demands wing parts do not have 'a local concave radius of curvature smaller than 100mm.'

This addition to the F1 regulations was introduced this year to prevent teams from running F-duct type systems. Its compliance is tested by the FIA using a 100mm ball template - which must remain in contact with the wing at all points.

Should the wing be too curved, as the Sauber design used in the race appeared to be, then the ball will have a gap between it and the wing.

Sauber technical director James Key said that he was seeking answers from the team's Hinwil factory as to why the design used in Melbourne had not passed the test.

"We didn't know anything about it until after the race," said Key in Melbourne. "It's possibly an oversight, certainly not intentional, and is nothing to do with F-ducts or anything else that circumvents the regulations. It is also not performance enhancing, as what happens on top of the element is incidental.

"How it has arisen needs to be investigated internally, and that is the process that we now need to go through."

Key added that other design specifications of wings that Sauber had available were all checked after the race and did comply with the rules.

Previous article Alonso unfazed by losing out to Petrov
Next article Horner confident RBR can stay ahead

Top Comments

Latest news