Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

Feature
Formula 1
Why Aston Martin is a better destination on the F1 driver market than it seems

What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Formula 1
What is it like being a Williams F1 simulator driver?

Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP
British GP
Marquez expects rivals to risk more in hunt for MotoGP title

MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

MotoGP
British GP
MotoGP title challenger Bezzecchi pessimistic for British GP

The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

Feature
Super Formula
Sugo
The rising Japanese star with his sights set firmly on IndyCar

WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

WRC
Rally Finland
WRC drivers split on whether Rally Finland was "too fast" after several crashes

Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

MotoGP
British GP
Silverstone to continue hosting MotoGP's British GP after new deal

Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

Formula 1
Should the algorithms in F1 power units be banned? FIA explains why it won’t work

No issues with wing, Williams insists

Williams technical director Sam Michael says he has no concerns about the level of vibration on the FW33's rear wing, amid suggestions that the way the wing is mounted in the radical design could cause problems

The team's 2011 design features a very low and re-angled differential and gearbox, with the rear suspension wishbones mounted onto the central rear wing support.

Michael dismissed reports that this was causing excessive movement of the wing.

"We have done three tests on it and we have not had any problems," he told AUTOSPORT.

"It's not because it's mounted on the suspension, as some people have suggested. It's because it is mounted on a single [central] pillar. The rear lower wing is fully-floating. The main structural mounting point is at one place.

"Actually for the last test we added two little stays to the rear wing endplates and that has stopped all that lateral shaking.

"To be clear, it's not because it is mounted on the suspension pillar. The suspension pillar is not moving, it's just the fact that it is mounted on the central pillar and that's the only place we hold it.

"If we had a higher gearbox and we mounted our wing on a pillar, exactly the same thing would happen."

He also revealed that Williams has a substantial new package arriving for the final winter test next month.

"We have a new diffuser, new front wing, new brake ducts, new bargeboards and new bodywork," said Michael. "The only thing that is not changing at the moment is the rear wing."

AUTOSPORT Plus subscribers can read Sam Michael's full exclusive insight into the FW33 design by clicking here.

Previous article Parr: Innovation will revive Williams
Next article Perez not thinking about times yet

Top Comments

Latest news