Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Intrepid octogenarian Bradley wows as Thundersports returns at Donington Park HSCC event

National
Intrepid octogenarian Bradley wows as Thundersports returns at Donington Park HSCC event

Why the differences between the Mercedes and McLaren F1 gearboxes matter

Formula 1
Why the differences between the Mercedes and McLaren F1 gearboxes matter

What we learned from MotoGP's Italian GP

Feature
MotoGP
Italian GP
What we learned from MotoGP's Italian GP

Johansson and Brown among the stars of Brands Hatch Masters Historic Festival

National
Johansson and Brown among the stars of Brands Hatch Masters Historic Festival

How Evans finally overcame Ogier in Rally Japan fight to assert title authority

Feature
WRC
Rally Japan
How Evans finally overcame Ogier in Rally Japan fight to assert title authority

What would you like to ask Robert Kubica?

WEC
What would you like to ask Robert Kubica?

How Palou showed his usual brilliance amid raging debate in IndyCar

Feature
IndyCar
Detroit
How Palou showed his usual brilliance amid raging debate in IndyCar

Proudfold-Nalder wins BRDC International Trophy as Wherrell grabs British F4 lead

National
Proudfold-Nalder wins BRDC International Trophy as Wherrell grabs British F4 lead

Ferrari critical of KERS plans

Ferrari's vice president Piero Ferrari believes the Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems will only increase costs and will not improve the racing

KERS are due to be introduced in Formula One from 2009 in what promises to be a major challenge for engineers.

The system will allow drivers to draw 60kW of energy from one axle on the car to be used in the form of a "push-to-pass" button to increase the chances of overtaking.

Ferrari, however, believes the system will not mean more overtaking and will also see the teams having to spend more money in research.

"We should reflect on many of the technical and sporting decisions taken in F1 lately," he told Italian magazine Autosprint.

"Engines were frozen with the result that all of them now run at 19,000 revolutions, so there's no difference in power nor revs, and therefore there's no way you can take advantage of a possible overrevving to try to overtake.

"We should have done something similar to what NASCAR has done: to set some limits in the regulations, while allowing for researching and re-designing. The way the regulations are right now, we can't re-design a single part to improve it. It's excessive. Ferrari have great engine guys twiddling their thumbs.

"By contrast, they make us spend time and money to design the KERS, for which we can't evaluate the costs precisely because it's a new technology.

"It's also based on knowledge unknown to traditional engine guys, like high-capacity batteries and high-performance electrical engines, for which you need specialized engineers from outside the motoring world.

"To acquire that know-how will cause high levels of spending over the years, it's not the best solution to reduce costs.

"Engine recovery is fine, but not this way. Too many different systems to recover energy have been permitted. They need to be limited, otherwise costs could go sky-high, with the risk of having to cut drastically on other areas to limit spending, as was done with engines, revs, and electronics.

"This way we risk to transform an F1 car into a GP2 car, and that must not happen."

Previous article Raikkonen aims to extend lead in Spain
Next article Grapevine: Heidfeld takes F1 to BMW factory

Top Comments

Latest news