Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Are F1's technical changes for Miami enough to ease 2026 concerns?

Feature
Formula 1
Are F1's technical changes for Miami enough to ease 2026 concerns?

FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Formula 1
Miami GP
FIA confirms changes to 2026 F1 rules ahead of Miami GP

Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Formula 1
Wolff warns against ADUO “gamesmanship”: Only one F1 manufacturer has a problem

Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Formula 1
Miami GP
Why 2026 F1 rule changes involve "a scalpel, not a baseball bat"

Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

General
Cars and stars from the 2026 Goodwood Members’ Meeting

Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Feature
BTCC
Donington Park (National Circuit)
Sutton takes early BTCC lead after Donington Park opener

Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

General
Close encounters bookend glorious Goodwood’s 83rd Members’ Meeting

Why 'inevitably' struck again in IndyCar as Palou won at Long Beach

Feature
IndyCar
Long Beach
Why 'inevitably' struck again in IndyCar as Palou won at Long Beach

Technical analysis of the Williams FW30

In keeping with the team's money efficient style, Williams' new car was rolled out without fanfare at the FIA test at Valencia this morning

Technical director Sam Michael has described the car as an evolution.

Last year saw the team make a return to both pace and reliability after a low point in their fortunes in 2006. Their FW29 was a neat, drag-efficient car, with a good reliability record.

With such a sound basis, to start their new car from the evolutionary approach should work for the team.

Looking at the new car, the similarity to its predecessor is obvious. The team have a number of new elements to the car and completed a similar amount of work in the detail and quality under the skin.

Weight distribution has been addressed, not officially stated, but no doubt the car has a more forward weight bias to suit the Bridgestone tyres. At this point the team feel the car is a "good step forward."

At the front a new three-element front wing adopts a conventional format - the wing itself being hung from its forward element, unlike the larger McLaren-like front wings. However, the this does follow McLaren's lead with a bridge wing: the new lower nose cone allows the bridge element to be tidier than the version raced late last year.

The nose cone also features quite large flow conditioners, routing the flow over the front suspension, one of which mounts on the FIA TV camera.

Around the front wheels, the inner brake ducts continue Williams' organically shaped duct with three inlets to feed the disc and calliper. While outside the wheel, the static fairings tried in testing have yet to appear.

Bargeboards and sidepods retain a similar shape, but the sidepods do gain new POD wings for the first time. These are quite simple versions and are joined with the chimneys slots half way up the endplate.

Equally the chimney they are attached to is new, eschewing the large side exit chimneys of recent Williams. Instead, the chimneys are slim vertically exiting designs, no longer joined to the T-wings, which are mounted on their own supports.

On the roll structure above the new cockpit padding is a revised mid wing, which is now swept back creating a trailing tip.

Previous article Technical analysis of the Renault R28
Next article Renault upbeat about first run with R28

Top Comments

Latest news