Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Mercedes shoots down favouritism speculation between Russell and Antonelli

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Mercedes shoots down favouritism speculation between Russell and Antonelli

MotoGP Czech GP: Marquez outduels Bagnaia to score back-to-back wins

MotoGP
Czech GP
MotoGP Czech GP: Marquez outduels Bagnaia to score back-to-back wins

What next for Formula 1’s rules?

Feature
Formula 1
What next for Formula 1’s rules?

How a racing novice crept up to speed in a Beetle-engined stalwart

Feature
National
How a racing novice crept up to speed in a Beetle-engined stalwart

Aston Martin's harsh reality was exposed in Monaco and Barcelona

Formula 1
Barcelona-Catalunya GP
Aston Martin's harsh reality was exposed in Monaco and Barcelona

Supercars Darwin: De Pasquale takes commanding Hidden Valley victory

Supercars
Darwin Triple Crown
Supercars Darwin: De Pasquale takes commanding Hidden Valley victory

Bezzecchi issues apology being hit with Czech GP ban for striking marshal

MotoGP
Czech GP
Bezzecchi issues apology being hit with Czech GP ban for striking marshal

Live: MotoGP Czech Grand Prix as it happens

MotoGP
Czech GP
Live: MotoGP Czech Grand Prix as it happens

Calendar set for revamp in 2008

The format of Formula One's calendar looks likely to remain pretty much unchanged next season, but a major revamp is likely to take place from 2008

F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone met with team bosses at Indianapolis on Saturday to begin preliminary talks about the future calendar.

Amid the discussions, which preceded a more lengthy debate about engine rules, was the possible inclusion of new races from 2008, talk about the future of the United States Grand Prix, and whether the sport should pursue having two races in some countries.

The teams welcomed the inclusion of new races, if they would add to F1's interest, but have indicated that they do not want the calendar to expand much more than the current 18 races. Any new events, with Mexico and South Korea having been mentioned, would be at the expense of current European races.

Sources have suggested that Imola would be the most likely first casualty, with another slot being freed up by rotating the German Grand Prix between Hockenheim and the Nurburgring. This could start as soon as next year, if Ecclestone needs to find a slot for the Belgian Grand Prix.

The teams have also urged Ecclestone to try and keep the sport at Indianapolis for the time being rather than pursue the idea of a race in Las Vegas or New York.

Renault boss Flavio Briatore told autosport.com: "I believe F1 needs to be in United States. If we have any other possibilities, we need to keep Indy.

"We need to keep one foot in the US, but sure, if you tell me what I prefer - it's Las Vegas and New York. But at the moment we have nothing else. I believe with Indianapolis we have to keep one foot in the US."

The teams also discussed whether the season should kick off in Bahrain, as it did this year, or revert to the traditional starter of Australia - which is believed to have a contractual commitment to stage the season opener.

But opinions between the teams on that matter appear to be split.

McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh said: "I think Bahrain worked quite well for the teams and F1, in my view. But we don't have a particularly strong influence on that."

Briatore said: "I prefer to start in Australia because we then take a long trip for the start of the season."

Previous article Alonso unfazed by Ferrari's speed at Indy
Next article Bourdais baffled by F1 ignoring him

Top Comments