Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Does Red Bull’s denial that Racing Bulls is helping it on-track stack up?

Formula 1
Does Red Bull’s denial that Racing Bulls is helping it on-track stack up?

Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

General
Top five roles on Motorsport Jobs this week

Audi surprises rivals as it ran upgraded F1 engine at Barcelona GP after ADUO verdict

Formula 1
Austrian GP
Audi surprises rivals as it ran upgraded F1 engine at Barcelona GP after ADUO verdict

How Verstappen almost conquered the world’s greatest circuit

Feature
Intercontinental GT Challenge
How Verstappen almost conquered the world’s greatest circuit

From simulator to stopwatch: The creative evidence teams have used to dispute F1 race results

Formula 1
Austrian GP
From simulator to stopwatch: The creative evidence teams have used to dispute F1 race results

FIA confirms 2027 F1 power unit changes

Formula 1
Austrian GP
FIA confirms 2027 F1 power unit changes

Aprilia faces its biggest challenge right now – and Marquez is just one part of it

Feature
MotoGP
Czech GP
Aprilia faces its biggest challenge right now – and Marquez is just one part of it

How Formula E’s F1-like calendar sees the two series converging – but also diverging

Formula E
How Formula E’s F1-like calendar sees the two series converging – but also diverging

Williams: KERS key to F1's green image

Williams team boss Sir Frank Williams believes reintroducing KERS to Formula 1 is essential for the sport's environmental image, and that the return of the energy-regenerating device would protect F1 from criticism from environmental groups and the press

KERS remains in the regulations following its single season of use last year, but the teams agreed not to run it in 2010 on cost grounds. Its return was debated during meetings at last weekend's Malaysian Grand Prix, and Williams said he was strongly in favour.

"I've always believed that Formula 1 needs a totem, to avoid - which we have done so far - the attention of unco-operative members of the press who don't follow Formula 1 very actively," he said.

"I use the word totem, but to explain what I mean in very general terms - it's quite the wrong word because KERS is a very meaningful thing for emission control and it does save power.

"It's expensive, it's difficult technically and it's a big swallow, but sooner or later Formula 1's going to get some aggro from one of these bodies that causes aggro."

Last year only McLaren and Ferrari used KERS for the majority of the season, with BMW and Renault abandoning their systems and the other teams opting to run without the device - although most had evaluated KERS in testing.

Brawn and Red Bull fought for the championship without needing KERS, but Williams believes the technology has already improved enough that if it returned any teams not running the system would be uncompetitive.

"If three teams had KERS and the other seven didn't, the chances of winning races if you haven't got KERS - now that the systems are becoming better and better - [not having it] is a major handicap," he said. "I believe it should be compulsory or not at all."

Williams was the only team to try out a flywheel-based KERS alongside the battery versions favoured by the rest of the teams, but Williams added that the refuelling ban now made flywheel KERS impractical.

"We can't use our own KERS because that's a flywheel, which takes up more room, and the only place to put it is behind the driver," he explained.

"If the fuel tank is three times the size it was two years ago, and you want to put KERS in it, you'll have your car longer than a London bus... So we'll use it elsewhere."

Previous article Q & A with Nick Fry
Next article Sutil sure Force India can stay in top 10

Top Comments

Latest news