What's wrong with F1's 2017 changes
With 2017 now upon us, anticipation is building ahead of Formula 1's new era. The next generation of cars will be the fastest ever, but will the technical shake-up work?
Why have the powers that be added downforce rather than just increasing mechanical grip? Will we not be left with the same situation where cars can't follow close to one another without destroying tyres?
Alex Hughes, via Twitter
Alex, I wish I knew. You are correct that adding mechanical grip via the tyres would have been fine. If I had anything to do with it, I would have reduced aerodynamic grip.
Share Or Save This Story
More from Gary Anderson
Ask Gary: Is there value in crossovers like Hamilton/Rossi?
Gary Anderson: How F1's 'privateers' really fared in 2019
F1's 'big four' teams' real 2019 performance levels revealed
What F1 learned from Ferrari's fuel breach
Ask Gary: Will the 2021 rules mean a Mercedes car concept change?
Where did Red Bull-Honda's pace come from?
Will Wolff's absence affect Mercedes in Brazil?
F1's prescriptive 2021 rules will only cause design convergence
Latest news
Ranking the top 10 BTCC liveries
RB brands Ricciardo/Tsunoda Chinese GP crashes “unnecessary”
How rain and strategy spelled disaster for Ferrari in WEC Imola 6 Hours
Wolff: Mercedes can't just keep living off F1 ‘bright spots’
Autosport Plus
Chinese Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2024
Why Verstappen's China F1 win was a sideshow to the real battle
How the pursuit of marginal F1 gains caused Sauber's pitstop stumbles
The short-term pain that hides a very real Williams improvement
Subscribe and access Autosport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
You have 2 options:
- Become a subscriber.
- Disable your adblocker.